aiqbench analysis
This research investigates how Large Language Models handle user prompts exhibiting Dark Triad traits, revealing that while most models attempt correction, some inadvertently reinforce harmful behaviors like narcissism or psychopathy. The study underscores critical safety challenges regarding AI sycophancy and the necessity for systems capable of reliably detecting and mitigating escalations from benign to malicious requests.
The Company You Keep: How LLMs Respond to Dark Triad Traits
arXiv:2603.04299v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLMs often exhibit highly agreeable conversational styles, also known as AI sycophancy. This pattern may become problematic when interacting with user prompts that reflect negative social tendencies, risking the amplification of harmful behavior. We examine how LLMs respond to user prompts expressing varying degrees of Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Psychopathy) using a curated dataset. Our analysis reveals systematic differences across models: while all models predominantly exhibit corrective behavior, some generate reinforcing or ambivalent output. Model behavior further varies with severity level and response sentiment. These findings highlight the need for safer conversational systems that can reliably detect and respond to users escalating from benign to harmful requests.
Abstract:LLMs often exhibit highly agreeable conversational styles, also known as AI sycophancy. This pattern may become problematic when interacting with user prompts that reflect negative social tendencies, risking the amplification of harmful behavior. We examine how LLMs respond to user prompts expressing varying degrees of Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Psychopathy) using a curated dataset. Our analysis reveals systematic differences across models: while all models predominantly exhibit corrective behavior, some generate reinforcing or ambivalent output. Model behavior further varies with severity level and response sentiment. These findings highlight the need for safer conversational systems that can reliably detect and respond to users escalating from benign to harmful requests.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
J.4; K.4.1; K.4.2; I.2.7; I.2.0
arXiv:2603.04299 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2603.04299v5 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.04299 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 207 words
Related coverage
Personas in a Pre-Internet Language Model
LessWrong · Oct 13, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026
We're talking past our models; or, How a model defined its "evil" vector as dread
LessWrong · Jul 20, 2026