Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research proposes a "capability manifold" framework to move beyond predictive loss as the sole metric for evaluating AI models, specifically addressing performance gaps in reasoning and planning within agentic systems. By unifying pre-training and test-time compute resources into bounded scaling functions, the study offers a more granular analytical tool for predicting how resource allocation impacts specific downstream capabilities.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Capability Manifold and ML Scaling Laws

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.27588v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing machine learning (ML) scaling laws relate predictive loss to compute, model parameters, and data. However, as models are increasingly deployed through agentic harnesses, loss alone is insufficient to characterize downstream performance: models with similar loss can exhibit different capabilities in reasoning, retrieval, planning, and adaptation. Yet, no unified framework connects such capabilities to the coupled resources available across the ML lifecycle. We bridge this gap by introducing a capability manifold, a multidimensional framework mapping downstream capabilities to pre-training, post-training, and test-time resources through bounded scaling functions. Analytical Jacobians quantify capability sensitivity to resource changes and interactions. As an initial application, we embed Kaplan- and Chinchilla-type scaling laws and test-time compute within the framework, demonstrating how existing scaling relationships can be unified as trajectories on a common capability manifold.

Abstract:Existing machine learning (ML) scaling laws relate predictive loss to compute, model parameters, and data. However, as models are increasingly deployed through agentic harnesses, loss alone is insufficient to characterize downstream performance: models with similar loss can exhibit different capabilities in reasoning, retrieval, planning, and adaptation. Yet, no unified framework connects such capabilities to the coupled resources available across the ML lifecycle. We bridge this gap by introducing a capability manifold, a multidimensional framework mapping downstream capabilities to pre-training, post-training, and test-time resources through bounded scaling functions. Analytical Jacobians quantify capability sensitivity to resource changes and interactions. As an initial application, we embed Kaplan- and Chinchilla-type scaling laws and test-time compute within the framework, demonstrating how existing scaling relationships can be unified as trajectories on a common capability manifold.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.27588 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.27588v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27588 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 226 words

Related coverage