Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates whether the recurrence mechanism in Selective State Space Models (SSMs) drives token consensus similarly to attention mechanisms in transformers, revealing a deeper architectural parallel between the two. By modeling SSM evolution as dynamical systems, the study demonstrates that while SSMs do aggregate tokens, specific components like output gates regulate this process to prevent full collapse. The findings offer critical theoretical insight into the stability and information mixing properties of next-generation efficient AI architectures.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Attention Within: Consensus Dynamics in Selective State Space Models

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.17997v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Selective state space models (SSMs) have recently emerged as a compelling alternative to transformers, combining competitive performance with substantially improved inference efficiency. At each SSM layer, a sequence of hidden states are propagated by a recurrence, mixing information of different tokens. Despite using a different mechanism, this mixing plays a role analogous to attention in transformers. In fact, recent works have shown that the two architectures may be closer than they first appear, as this recurrence admits a formulation akin to linear attention. In transformers, attention is known to drive the tokens to cluster, i.e., to reach consensus, collapsing in the limit to a single direction. Thus, we ask: does the recurrence at the core of SSMs drive the tokens to consensus, as attention does in transformers? To answer this question, we take a dynamical systems perspective on SSMs, modeling the evolution of tokens across layers as an ordinary differential equation. By exploiting input-to-state stability arguments, we establish local exponential stability of the consensus equilibria and characterize their domain of attraction for time-varying weight matrices, a setting not addressed by previous results. We thereby show that the resemblance between SSMs and transformers does run deeper: the recurrence at the core of SSMs aggregates tokens just as attention does. Numerical experiments on a pretrained Mamba-2 model point to the output gate as the component that regulates the extent of this consensus, preventing the tokens from reaching it in full.

Abstract:Selective state space models (SSMs) have recently emerged as a compelling alternative to transformers, combining competitive performance with substantially improved inference efficiency. At each SSM layer, a sequence of hidden states are propagated by a recurrence, mixing information of different tokens. Despite using a different mechanism, this mixing plays a role analogous to attention in transformers. In fact, recent works have shown that the two architectures may be closer than they first appear, as this recurrence admits a formulation akin to linear attention. In transformers, attention is known to drive the tokens to cluster, i.e., to reach consensus, collapsing in the limit to a single direction. Thus, we ask: does the recurrence at the core of SSMs drive the tokens to consensus, as attention does in transformers? To answer this question, we take a dynamical systems perspective on SSMs, modeling the evolution of tokens across layers as an ordinary differential equation. By exploiting input-to-state stability arguments, we establish local exponential stability of the consensus equilibria and characterize their domain of attraction for time-varying weight matrices, a setting not addressed by previous results. We thereby show that the resemblance between SSMs and transformers does run deeper: the recurrence at the core of SSMs aggregates tokens just as attention does. Numerical experiments on a pretrained Mamba-2 model point to the output gate as the component that regulates the extent of this consensus, preventing the tokens from reaching it in full.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY); Dynamical Systems (math.DS); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2609.17997 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.17997v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17997 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words

Related coverage