Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research challenges the prevailing Linear Representation Hypothesis by proposing that concept structures in language models are organized through answer basins defined by continuation probabilities rather than direct label alignment. Experimental results demonstrate that probing and steering effects emerge from the relationship between these basins and concept labels, offering a new framework for understanding internal model geometry.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Answer-Basin Representation Hypothesis: We Are Not Probing or Steering Concepts

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.24821v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Linear Representation Hypothesis associates high-level concepts with directions in language models, but it remains unclear how these concept-related linear structures are organized within the model. We propose the Answer-Basin Representation Hypothesis: the probability measure induced over answers by the model's continuation distribution organizes these linear structures, with its statistics represented along linear directions shared across questions. All continuations yielding the same answer form an answer basin, whose mass is their total probability. These basin masses define the pushforward probability measure over answers. We posit that concept-related linear structure emerges from differences in the answer measure rather than being determined by changes in concept labels. Experiments across models and tasks link concept-consistent effects and their reversals in probing and steering to the alignment between concept labels and the answer measure.

Abstract:The Linear Representation Hypothesis associates high-level concepts with directions in language models, but it remains unclear how these concept-related linear structures are organized within the model. We propose the Answer-Basin Representation Hypothesis: the probability measure induced over answers by the model's continuation distribution organizes these linear structures, with its statistics represented along linear directions shared across questions. All continuations yielding the same answer form an answer basin, whose mass is their total probability. These basin masses define the pushforward probability measure over answers. We posit that concept-related linear structure emerges from differences in the answer measure rather than being determined by changes in concept labels. Experiments across models and tasks link concept-consistent effects and their reversals in probing and steering to the alignment between concept labels and the answer measure.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.24821 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.24821v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24821 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 225 words

Related coverage