aiqbench analysis
This study exposes critical gaps in current agent benchmarks by shifting focus from static performance metrics to dynamic workplace scenarios involving task scheduling and active exploration. Experimental results reveal that state-of-the-art agents struggle significantly with continual learning and uncertainty management in stochastic environments, highlighting the urgent need for production-oriented evaluation frameworks. The accompanying open-source environment provides a necessary tool for assessing agent reliability beyond theoretical upper bounds.
The Agent's First Day: Benchmarking Learning, Exploration, and Scheduling in the Workplace Scenarios
arXiv:2601.08173v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The rapid evolution of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has advanced workflow automation; however, existing research mainly targets performance upper bounds in static environments, overlooking robustness for stochastic real-world deployment. We identify three key challenges: dynamic task scheduling, active exploration under uncertainty, and continuous learning from experience. To bridge this gap, we introduce \method{}, a dynamic evaluation environment that simulates a "trainee" agent continuously exploring a novel setting. Unlike traditional benchmarks, \method{} evaluates agents along three dimensions: (1) context-aware scheduling for streaming tasks with varying priorities; (2) prudent information acquisition to reduce hallucination via active exploration; and (3) continuous evolution by distilling generalized strategies from rule-based, dynamically generated tasks. Experiments show that cutting-edge agents have significant deficiencies in dynamic environments, especially in active exploration and continual learning. Our work establishes a framework for assessing agent reliability, shifting evaluation from static tests to realistic, production-oriented scenarios. Our codes are available at https://github.com/KnowledgeXLab/EvoEnv
Abstract:The rapid evolution of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has advanced workflow automation; however, existing research mainly targets performance upper bounds in static environments, overlooking robustness for stochastic real-world deployment. We identify three key challenges: dynamic task scheduling, active exploration under uncertainty, and continuous learning from experience. To bridge this gap, we introduce \method{}, a dynamic evaluation environment that simulates a "trainee" agent continuously exploring a novel setting. Unlike traditional benchmarks, \method{} evaluates agents along three dimensions: (1) context-aware scheduling for streaming tasks with varying priorities; (2) prudent information acquisition to reduce hallucination via active exploration; and (3) continuous evolution by distilling generalized strategies from rule-based, dynamically generated tasks. Experiments show that cutting-edge agents have significant deficiencies in dynamic environments, especially in active exploration and continual learning. Our work establishes a framework for assessing agent reliability, shifting evaluation from static tests to realistic, production-oriented scenarios. Our codes are available at this https URL
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2601.08173 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2601.08173v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.08173 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words
Related coverage
SWE-Explore: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Explore Repositories
arXiv · Jun 8, 2026
Benchmarking and Exploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Attack Investigations
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026
AdaExploreBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Proactive Exploration and Test-time Adaptation in Evolving Environments
arXiv · Oct 21, 2026
The AI Evaluation Ecosystem
arXiv · Oct 8, 2026