Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research exposes a critical paradox in edge AI where high-precision energy forecasting models can generate a net energy deficit due to inference costs and accelerated battery aging. The authors propose a Total Cost of Ownership framework that unifies operational energy consumption with physical capacity degradation, offering a necessary shift from accuracy-centric metrics to holistic efficiency for mission-critical systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Accuracy-Efficiency Paradox Quantifying Net Energy Loss in on-Device Energy Forecasting

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.26134v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Energy forecasting aims to maximize accuracy to ensure energy efficiency by reducing energy waste, an objective that applies equally to on-device forecasting for mission-critical edge environments, including military systems. However, this paper identifies the Accuracy-Efficiency Paradox: high-precision energy forecasting models can ironically trigger a net energy deficit. This stems from both edge AI's inference energy consumption and battery aging. We propose a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) framework for energy forecasting, designed to minimize net energy loss. This framework treats not only inference energy consumption but also battery aging as a unified form of energy loss, as degradation represents a physical dissipation of the system's future energy-carrying capacity. We demonstrate that in thermally sensitive edge environments, energy saved by the superior precision of complex architectures is often outweighed by the total energy lost through their high operational intensity.

Abstract:Energy forecasting aims to maximize accuracy to ensure energy efficiency by reducing energy waste, an objective that applies equally to on-device forecasting for mission-critical edge environments, including military systems. However, this paper identifies the Accuracy-Efficiency Paradox: high-precision energy forecasting models can ironically trigger a net energy deficit. This stems from both edge AI's inference energy consumption and battery aging. We propose a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) framework for energy forecasting, designed to minimize net energy loss. This framework treats not only inference energy consumption but also battery aging as a unified form of energy loss, as degradation represents a physical dissipation of the system's future energy-carrying capacity. We demonstrate that in thermally sensitive edge environments, energy saved by the superior precision of complex architectures is often outweighed by the total energy lost through their high operational intensity.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.26134 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.26134v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26134 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 230 words

Related coverage