Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces TestHallVQA, a new benchmark designed to evaluate Large Vision-Language Models on document-level visual question answering within the noisy, redundant contexts of scientific exams. By systematically injecting irrelevant visual tokens, the study quantifies how such redundancy degrades model performance and proposes a novel metric to assess robustness against these distractions. The work highlights critical gaps in current LVLMs regarding their ability to filter noise while maintaining deep reasoning over complex planar media.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

TestHallVQA: Exploring LVLMs' Document-Level Reasoning under Redundant Contexts from Scientific Exams

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.13158v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Vision--Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly expected to perform visual question answering (VQA) over planar media. However, existing planar VQA benchmarks typically emphasize isolated challenges: some emphasize long-document understanding with limited reasoning depth, while others require complex visual reasoning but remain restricted to single-page, noise-free settings. Moreover, through theoretical analysis, we identify the impact of irrelevant visual tokens, which leads to measurable performance degradation but has received little attention with respect to systematic quantification. To address these limitations, we introduce TestHallVQA, a multi-image VQA benchmark that simultaneously embodies document-level scale and the difficulty of human examinations, while providing comprehensive task coverage. Leveraging TestHallVQA's ability to controllably inject multi-level contextual redundancy, we further propose a novel metric, F1-R\textsuperscript{2}, which jointly quantifies LVLMs' computational reasoning capability and their evidence retrieval robustness against document-level redundancy. Extensive experiments and analyses on mainstream LVLMs reveal their latent deficiencies across multiple dimensions, offering concrete insights and directions for future research. The associated datasets, code, and complete theoretical derivations are available at https://github.com/yqyu2317/TestHallVQA-benchmark.

Abstract:Large Vision--Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly expected to perform visual question answering (VQA) over planar media. However, existing planar VQA benchmarks typically emphasize isolated challenges: some emphasize long-document understanding with limited reasoning depth, while others require complex visual reasoning but remain restricted to single-page, noise-free settings. Moreover, through theoretical analysis, we identify the impact of irrelevant visual tokens, which leads to measurable performance degradation but has received little attention with respect to systematic quantification. To address these limitations, we introduce TestHallVQA, a multi-image VQA benchmark that simultaneously embodies document-level scale and the difficulty of human examinations, while providing comprehensive task coverage. Leveraging TestHallVQA's ability to controllably inject multi-level contextual redundancy, we further propose a novel metric, F1-R\textsuperscript{2}, which jointly quantifies LVLMs' computational reasoning capability and their evidence retrieval robustness against document-level redundancy. Extensive experiments and analyses on mainstream LVLMs reveal their latent deficiencies across multiple dimensions, offering concrete insights and directions for future research. The associated datasets, code, and complete theoretical derivations are available at this https URL.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.13158 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.13158v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13158 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 263 words

Related coverage