aiqbench analysis
This study provides critical empirical guidance for scaling pixel-wise Earth observation foundation models, revealing that pretraining loss is an unreliable proxy for downstream performance. The authors establish a concrete compute allocation strategy where encoders and data must grow together while projectors remain fixed to maximize efficiency. Furthermore, the resulting distilled student model outperforms larger proprietary embeddings by leveraging Matryoshka representations to drastically reduce storage costs without significant accuracy trade-offs.
TESSERA v2: Scaling Pixel-wise Earth Foundation Models
arXiv:2607.03949v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pixel-wise Earth-observation (EO) foundation models are now achieving state-of-the-art performance via generated spatial embeddings. However, how these models scale and how best to spend a pretraining budget remain poorly understood. We present the largest controlled scaling study for EO to date: 395 training runs within a fixed pixel-wise Barlow Twins family, each evaluated on 15 diverse downstream tasks. We find that pretraining loss barely predicts downstream performance (|Pearson r| < 0.2), so selecting models by loss wastes a large share of the compute. We also find that, as the training budget grows, the encoder and the data should grow together while the projector stays fixed, which gives a simple rule for allocating compute. Using this rule, we train a family of pixel-wise teachers (0.5B, 1B, and 2B) and distil the largest into compact students for embeddings-as-data deployment. In aggregate, our 44-million-parameter distilled student outperforms every open and proprietary embedding product we test, several of them an order of magnitude larger. These students produce Matryoshka representations that are inexpensive to serve: a 16-dimensional prefix keeps 92% of the full 128-dimensional performance at 1/8 of the storage. Together, these results give a concrete, empirically grounded recipe for scaling pixel-wise EO foundation models: train large encoders, select by downstream performance, and distil into flexible student models. We plan to release global 10 m annual embeddings covering 2017-2025 as version 2 of the TESSERA foundation-model embeddings product. All code is available at: https://github.com/ucam-eo/tessera
Abstract:Pixel-wise Earth-observation (EO) foundation models are now achieving state-of-the-art performance via generated spatial embeddings. However, how these models scale and how best to spend a pretraining budget remain poorly understood. We present the largest controlled scaling study for EO to date: 395 training runs within a fixed pixel-wise Barlow Twins family, each evaluated on 15 diverse downstream tasks. We find that pretraining loss barely predicts downstream performance (|Pearson r| < 0.2), so selecting models by loss wastes a large share of the compute. We also find that, as the training budget grows, the encoder and the data should grow together while the projector stays fixed, which gives a simple rule for allocating compute. Using this rule, we train a family of pixel-wise teachers (0.5B, 1B, and 2B) and distil the largest into compact students for embeddings-as-data deployment. In aggregate, our 44-million-parameter distilled student outperforms every open and proprietary embedding product we test, several of them an order of magnitude larger. These students produce Matryoshka representations that are inexpensive to serve: a 16-dimensional prefix keeps 92% of the full 128-dimensional performance at 1/8 of the storage. Together, these results give a concrete, empirically grounded recipe for scaling pixel-wise EO foundation models: train large encoders, select by downstream performance, and distil into flexible student models. We plan to release global 10 m annual embeddings covering 2017-2025 as version 2 of the TESSERA foundation-model embeddings product. All code is available at: this https URL
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.03949 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2607.03949v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.03949 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 339 words
Related coverage
ORBIT-2 based Weather and Climate Downscaling and Downscaled Global Forecasts on AMD Instinct
AMD · Jun 8, 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026
From pixels to planning: Earth AI for nature restoration
Google Research · Jun 16, 2026

The OlmoEarth Platform: Geospatial inference at planetary scale
Hugging Face · Jul 28, 2026