Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of the Key-Value (KV) cache structure in autoregressive transformers, identifying distinct low-rank patterns in token and feature modes versus full-rank behavior in head and layer modes. By comparing Tucker, CP, tensor train, and t-SVD decompositions at matched storage, the research demonstrates that Tucker decomposition minimizes reconstruction error while preserving essential high-rank information, offering a concrete pathway for optimizing memory efficiency without sacrificing model performance.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Tensor Decomposition of Transformer Key-Value Caches: Spectral Structure and Format Comparison

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.28029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The key-value (KV) cache of autoregressive transformers can be viewed as a fourth-order tensor spanning attention heads, tokens, features, and grouped layers. We measure the singular-value spectra of all four mode unfoldings on Mistral-7B-v0.3 and LLaMA-2-13B and compare four standard tensor decompositions: Tucker, CP, tensor train, and t-SVD, at matched storage. The spectra partition the four axes into two classes. The token and feature modes carry low-rank structure, particularly for keys. The head and layer modes are nearly full-rank and resist compression at any practical error level. Among the four decompositions, Tucker achieves the lowest reconstruction error at every compression ratio from $2\times$ to $5\times$, because it can leave the full-rank modes untouched. Comparisons with two-dimensional unfolding baselines show that the preferred representation differs between keys and values: 2D methods achieve lower key error, while four-way Tucker achieves lower value error at matched storage. A mode-pinning theorem certifies the full-rank preservation from the measured spectra alone. Two further spectral properties affect the compressible modes without touching the full-rank ones: values reach a higher error floor than keys at every ratio, and post-RoPE keys lose $41\%$ - $64\%$ of their pre-RoPE compressibility on both models.

Abstract:The key-value (KV) cache of autoregressive transformers can be viewed as a fourth-order tensor spanning attention heads, tokens, features, and grouped layers. We measure the singular-value spectra of all four mode unfoldings on Mistral-7B-v0.3 and LLaMA-2-13B and compare four standard tensor decompositions: Tucker, CP, tensor train, and t-SVD, at matched storage. The spectra partition the four axes into two classes. The token and feature modes carry low-rank structure, particularly for keys. The head and layer modes are nearly full-rank and resist compression at any practical error level. Among the four decompositions, Tucker achieves the lowest reconstruction error at every compression ratio from $2\times$ to $5\times$, because it can leave the full-rank modes untouched. Comparisons with two-dimensional unfolding baselines show that the preferred representation differs between keys and values: 2D methods achieve lower key error, while four-way Tucker achieves lower value error at matched storage. A mode-pinning theorem certifies the full-rank preservation from the measured spectra alone. Two further spectral properties affect the compressible modes without touching the full-rank ones: values reach a higher error floor than keys at every ratio, and post-RoPE keys lose $41\%$ - $64\%$ of their pre-RoPE compressibility on both models.

18 pages, 3 figures, 8 tables. Submitted to SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications (SIMAX)

Numerical Analysis (math.NA); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.28029 [math.NA]

(or arXiv:2609.28029v1 [math.NA] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28029 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 311 words

Related coverage