aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates that for machine learning climate downscaling, distributing training data across the full climate trajectory outperforms contiguous historical blocks, effectively challenging stationarity assumptions. By broad sampling internal variability, models achieve superior performance in reproducing unseen ensemble members while requiring only one-tenth of the available high-resolution data. This finding offers a practical strategy for optimizing limited computational budgets in regional climate impact assessments.
Temporal Coverage over Density: Parsimonious Training-Set Design for ML Climate Downscaling
arXiv:2606.07898v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-resolution regional climate simulations provide critical information for climate impacts assessments but remain computationally expensive, motivating the development of machine-learning downscalers and emulators. A key challenge is determining how limited high-resolution simulations should be distributed across a changing climate trajectory to capture both forced climate response and internal variability. Using the CESM2 Large Ensemble over the western United States, we compare three training-year selection strategies under fixed data budgets: a contiguous block of historical years, years drawn from both the beginning and end of the simulation period, and years distributed throughout the full climate trajectory. Including both historical and future years consistently outperforms training on historical years alone, demonstrating the importance of exposing downscaling models to climate states outside the historical record and highlighting limitations of stationarity assumptions common in statistical downscaling. Training on years distributed throughout the full climate trajectory performs best overall, indicating that broad sampling of internal variability provides additional information beyond exposure to the forced climate response alone. Models trained on temporally distributed subsets more successfully reproduce variability in unseen ensemble members while retaining strong performance across a wide range of climate diagnostics. Even when trained on only one-tenth of the available high-resolution years, temporally distributed models remain highly competitive with full-data training. These results suggest that, under fixed computational budgets, broad sampling of climate states is more valuable than temporal continuity when allocating scarce high-resolution simulations. The findings provide practical guidance for regional climate downscaling and large-ensemble projection workflows.
Abstract:High-resolution regional climate simulations provide critical information for climate impacts assessments but remain computationally expensive, motivating the development of machine-learning downscalers and emulators. A key challenge is determining how limited high-resolution simulations should be distributed across a changing climate trajectory to capture both forced climate response and internal variability. Using the CESM2 Large Ensemble over the western United States, we compare three training-year selection strategies under fixed data budgets: a contiguous block of historical years, years drawn from both the beginning and end of the simulation period, and years distributed throughout the full climate trajectory. Including both historical and future years consistently outperforms training on historical years alone, demonstrating the importance of exposing downscaling models to climate states outside the historical record and highlighting limitations of stationarity assumptions common in statistical downscaling. Training on years distributed throughout the full climate trajectory performs best overall, indicating that broad sampling of internal variability provides additional information beyond exposure to the forced climate response alone. Models trained on temporally distributed subsets more successfully reproduce variability in unseen ensemble members while retaining strong performance across a wide range of climate diagnostics. Even when trained on only one-tenth of the available high-resolution years, temporally distributed models remain highly competitive with full-data training. These results suggest that, under fixed computational budgets, broad sampling of climate states is more valuable than temporal continuity when allocating scarce high-resolution simulations. The findings provide practical guidance for regional climate downscaling and large-ensemble projection workflows.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE)
arXiv:2606.07898 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.07898v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07898 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 344 words
Related coverage
Scalable Deep Learning Framework for Global High-Resolution Land Use Reconstruction
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026
AI4Land: Scalable Deep Learning for Global High-Resolution Land Use Reconstruction
arXiv · Jun 11, 2026
Data Leakage Inflates Generalizability of Power Outage Prediction Models
arXiv · Aug 26, 2026
SEMICON Taiwan 2026 Kicks Off: AI Chip Bottleneck Is Wires Connecting Them
techtimes.com · Aug 31, 2026