Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates the efficacy of truncation sampling methods like top-p and min-p at standard deployment temperatures (0.6–1.0), challenging the assumption that they universally improve accuracy. The study finds that these techniques only yield benefits when higher temperatures cause significant performance degradation; otherwise, plain temperature sampling remains optimal. For practitioners tuning inference pipelines, this suggests truncation parameters should be applied conditionally rather than as a default setting to avoid unnecessary computational overhead.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Temperature Fragility and the Conditional Benefits of Truncation Sampling

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.15476v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models generate text by sampling each token from a predicted distribution, and a temperature parameter sets how far the draw strays from the most probable tokens. Truncation samplers such as top-p and min-p discard the least probable tokens before the draw, so that sampling at high temperature stays coherent. Their reported accuracy gains come from temperatures of 1.5 to 3, while the defaults of deployed systems cluster between 0.6 and 1.0. Whether they change accuracy at those defaults, and for which models, has not been measured. We test thirteen open-weight models on GSM8K and MMLU-Pro at temperatures 0.7, 1.0, and 1.3 in one controlled pipeline, ten of them under eight decoding configurations. Six of the thirteen models lose 17 to 38 accuracy points on MMLU-Pro between 0.7 and 1.3, and the other seven lose at most 10. The lost accuracy comes from generations that run to the token limit or never state an answer. These results suggest that truncation samplers improve accuracy primarily when higher temperatures substantially degrade model performance. Where accuracy remains stable across temperatures, none of the tested truncation samplers improves on plain temperature sampling.

Abstract:Large language models generate text by sampling each token from a predicted distribution, and a temperature parameter sets how far the draw strays from the most probable tokens. Truncation samplers such as top-p and min-p discard the least probable tokens before the draw, so that sampling at high temperature stays coherent. Their reported accuracy gains come from temperatures of 1.5 to 3, while the defaults of deployed systems cluster between 0.6 and 1.0. Whether they change accuracy at those defaults, and for which models, has not been measured. We test thirteen open-weight models on GSM8K and MMLU-Pro at temperatures 0.7, 1.0, and 1.3 in one controlled pipeline, ten of them under eight decoding configurations. Six of the thirteen models lose 17 to 38 accuracy points on MMLU-Pro between 0.7 and 1.3, and the other seven lose at most 10. The lost accuracy comes from generations that run to the token limit or never state an answer. These results suggest that truncation samplers improve accuracy primarily when higher temperatures substantially degrade model performance. Where accuracy remains stable across temperatures, none of the tested truncation samplers improves on plain temperature sampling.

20 pages, 8 figures, 16 tables. Code and data: this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.15476 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.15476v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15476 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 299 words

Related coverage