Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces TAVIS, a new benchmark infrastructure designed to standardize the evaluation of active vision and anticipatory gaze within imitation learning frameworks. By establishing shared task suites and novel metrics like GALT, it provides critical empirical evidence on how gaze control impacts performance across different robot embodiments and distribution shifts. The work addresses a significant gap in the field by offering a rigorous way to quantify the specific contributions of active vision versus passive observation in robotic manipulation.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

TAVIS: A Benchmark for Egocentric Active Vision and Anticipatory Gaze in Imitation Learning

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2605.07943v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Active vision -- where a policy controls its own gaze during manipulation -- has emerged as a key capability for imitation learning, with multiple independent systems demonstrating its benefits in the past year. Yet there is no shared benchmark to compare approaches or quantify what active vision contributes, on which task types, and under what conditions. We introduce TAVIS, evaluation infrastructure for active-vision imitation learning, with two complementary task suites -- TAVIS-Head (5 tasks, global search via pan/tilt necks) and TAVIS-Hands (3 tasks, local occlusion via wrist cameras) -- on two humanoid torso embodiments (GR1T2, Reachy2), built on IsaacLab. TAVIS provides three evaluation primitives: a paired headcam-vs-fixedcam protocol on identical demonstrations; GALT (Gaze-Action Lead Time), a novel metric grounded in cognitive science and HRI that quantifies anticipatory gaze in learned policies; and procedural ID/OOD splits. Baseline experiments with Diffusion Policy and $\pi_0$ reveal that (i) active vision generally helps, consistently across training runs, but benefits are task-conditional rather than uniform; (ii) multi-task policies degrade sharply under controlled distribution shifts on both suites; and (iii) imitation alone yields anticipatory gaze that lands on the task-relevant object, with lead times comparable to those of the human demonstrations, although head motion is less smooth than in the demonstrations, an effect of action chunking that success rate does not reveal. Code and evaluation scripts are released at https://github.com/spiglerg/tavis; demonstrations (LeRobot v3.0; ~2200 episodes) and trained baselines at https://huggingface.co/tavis-benchmark.

Abstract:Active vision -- where a policy controls its own gaze during manipulation -- has emerged as a key capability for imitation learning, with multiple independent systems demonstrating its benefits in the past year. Yet there is no shared benchmark to compare approaches or quantify what active vision contributes, on which task types, and under what conditions. We introduce TAVIS, evaluation infrastructure for active-vision imitation learning, with two complementary task suites -- TAVIS-Head (5 tasks, global search via pan/tilt necks) and TAVIS-Hands (3 tasks, local occlusion via wrist cameras) -- on two humanoid torso embodiments (GR1T2, Reachy2), built on IsaacLab. TAVIS provides three evaluation primitives: a paired headcam-vs-fixedcam protocol on identical demonstrations; GALT (Gaze-Action Lead Time), a novel metric grounded in cognitive science and HRI that quantifies anticipatory gaze in learned policies; and procedural ID/OOD splits. Baseline experiments with Diffusion Policy and $\pi_0$ reveal that (i) active vision generally helps, consistently across training runs, but benefits are task-conditional rather than uniform; (ii) multi-task policies degrade sharply under controlled distribution shifts on both suites; and (iii) imitation alone yields anticipatory gaze that lands on the task-relevant object, with lead times comparable to those of the human demonstrations, although head motion is less smooth than in the demonstrations, an effect of action chunking that success rate does not reveal. Code and evaluation scripts are released at this https URL demonstrations (LeRobot v3.0; ~2200 episodes) and trained baselines at this https URL.

29 pages, 6 figures, 14 tables. v2: revised and extended (inter-seed variability, wrist-camera ablation, GALT validation and sensitivity analyses, gaze behaviour statistics). Project page: this https URL

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2605.07943 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2605.07943v2 [cs.RO] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 287 words

Related coverage