aiqbench analysis
This study expands voice-agent evaluation beyond English-only metrics, revealing significant performance gaps and distinct failure modes in Korean and Mandarin systems during full-duplex interactions. By releasing native-speaker validated judges and language packs, the authors provide essential infrastructure for building robust, multilingual conversational AI that addresses real-world linguistic diversity. The findings underscore the necessity of separating task completion from generation quality to accurately assess model capabilities across different languages.
$\tau$-Multilingual: Benchmarking Voice Agents Across Languages
arXiv:2609.35820v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: English-only benchmarks expose only a narrow slice of voice-agent behavior. We introduce $\tau$-Multilingual, extending $\tau$-Voice to Spanish, Brazilian Portuguese, Hindi, Korean, and Mandarin with native-speaker review and evaluation of generated language and spoken output. Across 4,500 full-duplex calls and five voice configurations, Spanish, Portuguese, and Hindi remain within 3.2 task-completion points of English, but Korean and Mandarin fall by 14.7 and 8.4 points. The failure modes also vary: Korean systems miss more responses, Mandarin systems interrupt more often, and both struggle with tools and entities. Grok leads task completion but scores lowest on generation quality, motivating separate task, interaction, and generation reporting. We release language packs, validated judges, and tools for community-built multilingual voice-agent evaluation.
Abstract:English-only benchmarks expose only a narrow slice of voice-agent behavior. We introduce $\tau$-Multilingual, extending $\tau$-Voice to Spanish, Brazilian Portuguese, Hindi, Korean, and Mandarin with native-speaker review and evaluation of generated language and spoken output. Across 4,500 full-duplex calls and five voice configurations, Spanish, Portuguese, and Hindi remain within 3.2 task-completion points of English, but Korean and Mandarin fall by 14.7 and 8.4 points. The failure modes also vary: Korean systems miss more responses, Mandarin systems interrupt more often, and both struggle with tools and entities. Grok leads task completion but scores lowest on generation quality, motivating separate task, interaction, and generation reporting. We release language packs, validated judges, and tools for community-built multilingual voice-agent evaluation.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Sound (cs.SD); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
arXiv:2609.35820 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.35820v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35820 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 220 words
Related coverage
How to Fine-Tune Nemotron 3.5 ASR for Your Language, Domain, or Accent
Hugging Face · Jun 4, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026
Can Voice Agents Handle Bilingual Customers? Benchmarking Frontier ASR on Code-Switched Speech
Hugging Face · Jun 9, 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026