Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces "Task-Sufficient Contraction," a theoretical framework for reducing data sources before encoding based on specific downstream tasks, ensuring that the reduced representation preserves the complete problem family for subsequent optimization. By characterizing exact contractions for finite action sets and quadratic losses, it offers a rigorous method for heterogeneous machines to exchange only the necessary information without aligning full internal representations. This work advances the foundations of efficient communication and compression in machine learning systems by formalizing when source reduction is lossless relative to a declared task.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Task-Sufficient Contraction: Source Selection for Machine Information Interfaces

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2610.08884v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A declared task can sometimes certify a reduced source before a downstream encoder, codebook, rate, distortion target, or optimizer is chosen. This paper studies when one such reduction preserves the complete downstream problem family, a property termed Task-Sufficient Contraction. The reduced source is fixed by the task before the later operating point is selected. An exact contraction allows the later problem to be solved on that source with the same result as if the full source had been retained. For a machine with a fixed set of possible actions and a fixed loss, the paper identifies a consumer-specific source by merging states only when every available action has the same regret in both. For finite action sets, replacing the richer source by this reduced source preserves the complete one-step rate-regret curve, even though the reduction is fixed before the distortion target is chosen. A second result gives an exact characterization for quadratic loss on affine feasible-action sets: the canonical reduced source is the projection onto the directions in which feasible actions can differ. Under a fixed energy budget, this becomes centered load, while retaining only the optimal water-filled action is too coarse. Earlier Information Bottleneck, semantic rate-distortion, and goal-oriented quantization results are then used to distinguish exact, architecture-conditioned, approximate, failed, and corrected contractions. The framework suggests a way for heterogeneous machines to exchange what a receiving task needs without first aligning their full internal representations.

Abstract:A declared task can sometimes certify a reduced source before a downstream encoder, codebook, rate, distortion target, or optimizer is chosen. This paper studies when one such reduction preserves the complete downstream problem family, a property termed Task-Sufficient Contraction. The reduced source is fixed by the task before the later operating point is selected. An exact contraction allows the later problem to be solved on that source with the same result as if the full source had been retained. For a machine with a fixed set of possible actions and a fixed loss, the paper identifies a consumer-specific source by merging states only when every available action has the same regret in both. For finite action sets, replacing the richer source by this reduced source preserves the complete one-step rate-regret curve, even though the reduction is fixed before the distortion target is chosen. A second result gives an exact characterization for quadratic loss on affine feasible-action sets: the canonical reduced source is the projection onto the directions in which feasible actions can differ. Under a fixed energy budget, this becomes centered load, while retaining only the optimal water-filled action is too coarse. Earlier Information Bottleneck, semantic rate-distortion, and goal-oriented quantization results are then used to distinguish exact, architecture-conditioned, approximate, failed, and corrected contractions. The framework suggests a way for heterogeneous machines to exchange what a receiving task needs without first aligning their full internal representations.

19 pages, 1 figure, 1 table. An earlier version was first posted on Zenodo in September 2026 (v1: doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22834532%3B all versions: doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22834531). Companion paper on task-relative information contracts: doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22819849

Information Theory (cs.IT); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.08884 [cs.IT]

(or arXiv:2610.08884v1 [cs.IT] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08884 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 361 words

Related coverage