aiqbench analysis
This research addresses suboptimality in Behavioral Foundation Models by replacing ordinary least squares inference with a method that balances reward reconstruction error against successor-measure mismatch. The proposed approach theoretically bounds the suboptimality gap and empirically outperforms baselines across locomotion, manipulation, and humanoid control benchmarks with negligible computational cost. By refining how task vectors are inferred from reward functions, this work directly enhances the efficiency and performance of zero-shot policy retrieval in embodied AI systems.
Task Inference Beyond Least Squares in Behavioral Foundation Models
arXiv:2610.05350v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Behavioral Foundation Models (BFMs) aim to solve a wide range of downstream tasks without test-time policy learning by inferring a task vector from the reward function. While efficient, the retrieved policies are often suboptimal because of how this task vector is inferred, typically with ordinary least squares (OLS). OLS minimizes reward reconstruction error but leaves the ordering of rewards unconstrained, which can bias the successor measure of the retrieved zero-shot policy away from that of the optimal policy. In this work, we propose BLS, an efficient test-time inference method that balances minimizing reward reconstruction error with reducing successor-measure mismatch. Theoretically, we provide a suboptimality gap upper bound characterized by both successor-measure and reward-function residuals. Empirically, we evaluate BLS on top of state-of-the-art BFMs across benchmarks for locomotion, manipulation, and humanoid control. BLS outperforms existing task inference baselines with negligible computational overhead. Project page: https://embodiedai-ntu.github.io/BLS
Abstract:Behavioral Foundation Models (BFMs) aim to solve a wide range of downstream tasks without test-time policy learning by inferring a task vector from the reward function. While efficient, the retrieved policies are often suboptimal because of how this task vector is inferred, typically with ordinary least squares (OLS). OLS minimizes reward reconstruction error but leaves the ordering of rewards unconstrained, which can bias the successor measure of the retrieved zero-shot policy away from that of the optimal policy. In this work, we propose BLS, an efficient test-time inference method that balances minimizing reward reconstruction error with reducing successor-measure mismatch. Theoretically, we provide a suboptimality gap upper bound characterized by both successor-measure and reward-function residuals. Empirically, we evaluate BLS on top of state-of-the-art BFMs across benchmarks for locomotion, manipulation, and humanoid control. BLS outperforms existing task inference baselines with negligible computational overhead. Project page: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.05350 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.05350v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05350 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 240 words
Related coverage

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026