aiqbench analysis
This research addresses resource efficiency in Large Language Model (LLM) agents by optimizing their access permissions for mission-critical infrastructure tasks like liquid cooling and power grid management. The proposed "map-guided escalation" algorithm dynamically adjusts information provisioning, significantly reducing token usage while maintaining or improving accuracy compared to full-access baselines. These findings highlight a critical shift toward domain-specific optimization strategies rather than universal configurations for deploying AI agents in high-stakes environments.
Task-Aware Harness Provisioning for LLM Agents in Mission-Critical Infrastructure Operations
arXiv:2608.17433v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents have been widely adopted to operate mission-critical infrastructure (MCI). These agents normally rely on a harness that determines what information they can access, which tools they can use, and what actions they can take. Existing systems often expose the same comprehensive harness to every task, which may not be necessary and cause resource wastes. In this paper, we focus on the identification of optimal harness configurations, and view it as a resource-matching problem between what each task requires and what the harness provides. To measure this match, we classify MCI tasks based on the mathematical representation of the underlying system and rank harness configurations by the amount and type of information they provide. We then construct task-to-harness mappings from two sources: mining research literature and measuring controlled agent execution. Leveraging the measured mapping, we propose a new harness provisioning algorithm: map-guided escalation. It begins with a task-specific harness and expands to full provision only after a failed self-check. We evaluate our method in two representative MCI tasks: in liquid cooling, it improves the agent accuracy from 0.652 under full provision to 0.715 and achieves accuracy comparable to Reflexion with 48% fewer tokens; In power grids, full provision remains accuracy-optimal, while map-based provisioning offers lower-cost alternatives. These findings show that harness provisioning follows a domain-dependent accuracy-cost Pareto frontier rather than a universal optimum.
Abstract:LLM agents have been widely adopted to operate mission-critical infrastructure (MCI). These agents normally rely on a harness that determines what information they can access, which tools they can use, and what actions they can take. Existing systems often expose the same comprehensive harness to every task, which may not be necessary and cause resource wastes. In this paper, we focus on the identification of optimal harness configurations, and view it as a resource-matching problem between what each task requires and what the harness provides. To measure this match, we classify MCI tasks based on the mathematical representation of the underlying system and rank harness configurations by the amount and type of information they provide. We then construct task-to-harness mappings from two sources: mining research literature and measuring controlled agent execution. Leveraging the measured mapping, we propose a new harness provisioning algorithm: map-guided escalation. It begins with a task-specific harness and expands to full provision only after a failed self-check. We evaluate our method in two representative MCI tasks: in liquid cooling, it improves the agent accuracy from 0.652 under full provision to 0.715 and achieves accuracy comparable to Reflexion with 48% fewer tokens; In power grids, full provision remains accuracy-optimal, while map-based provisioning offers lower-cost alternatives. These findings show that harness provisioning follows a domain-dependent accuracy-cost Pareto frontier rather than a universal optimum.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
arXiv:2608.17433 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.17433v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17433 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 321 words
Related coverage

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · Jun 8, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026