aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Target-Constrained Pooling (TCP), a novel machine learning method designed to improve trajectory extrapolation by leveraging complementary source signals to resolve underdetermined forecasting problems. The approach demonstrates significant efficiency gains, reducing computational costs while achieving substantial reductions in mean RMSE across diverse domains and forecast directions.
Target-Constrained Pooling for Trajectory Extrapolation
arXiv:2610.13034v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trajectory extrapolation from a partial target trajectory is underdetermined, but completed related trajectories provide information about the unresolved continuation. We propose target-constrained pooling (TCP), which separates the finite-horizon endpoint from continuation shape and estimates that endpoint from two complementary source signals. Uniform pooling captures final response levels, while matched-increment pooling captures the remaining change after aligning source and target states. TCP selects representative sources, projects both endpoint estimates onto a target-consistent region, converts them into corrections of the free forecast, and controls their influence through strength calibration and degradation-aware weighting. Across 25,245 targets from five domains and both forecasting directions, TCP reduces mean RMSE by 35.8% to 42.1% for all ten target-only forecasters and improves all 100 forecaster, dataset, and direction comparisons. The two endpoint signals consistently outperform either alone, while representative selection remains within 0.64% to 1.02% of the full donor pool using 12.7x fewer donor inputs and 138.8x fewer matching distance computations.
Abstract:Trajectory extrapolation from a partial target trajectory is underdetermined, but completed related trajectories provide information about the unresolved continuation. We propose target-constrained pooling (TCP), which separates the finite-horizon endpoint from continuation shape and estimates that endpoint from two complementary source signals. Uniform pooling captures final response levels, while matched-increment pooling captures the remaining change after aligning source and target states. TCP selects representative sources, projects both endpoint estimates onto a target-consistent region, converts them into corrections of the free forecast, and controls their influence through strength calibration and degradation-aware weighting. Across 25,245 targets from five domains and both forecasting directions, TCP reduces mean RMSE by 35.8% to 42.1% for all ten target-only forecasters and improves all 100 forecaster, dataset, and direction comparisons. The two endpoint signals consistently outperform either alone, while representative selection remains within 0.64% to 1.02% of the full donor pool using 12.7x fewer donor inputs and 138.8x fewer matching distance computations.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.13034 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.13034v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13034 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 248 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026
Let the Target Select for Itself: Data Selection via Target-Aligned Paths
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026

[AINews] Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026