aiqbench analysis
This study presents the Tanawpamana Dataset and Benchmark, specifically evaluating how vision-language models perform on Philippine cultural heritage sites to address representation gaps in global AI training data. The research highlights critical limitations in fine-grained visual discrimination for similar structures and reveals that geographic knowledge inferred from images is often weaker than text-based inference.
Tanawpamana: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Philippine Cultural Heritage Sites
arXiv:2610.17596v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models are increasingly used to identify and describe places, yet their recognition and knowledge of specific cultures remain poorly understood, particularly in underrepresented regions such as the Philippines. This study introduces the Tanawpamana Dataset, a repository of Philippine heritage site images with metadata based on the Talapamana registry of the National Commission for Culture and the Arts of the Philippines. We also introduce the Tanawpamana Benchmark, comprising 4,046 tasks designed to evaluate models' recognition and knowledge of heritage sites. Evaluating seven vision-language models, we find that they struggle more with fine-grained visual discrimination among similar heritage sites than with coarse recognition, and that their geographic knowledge is weaker when inferred from image inputs than from text.
Abstract:Vision-language models are increasingly used to identify and describe places, yet their recognition and knowledge of specific cultures remain poorly understood, particularly in underrepresented regions such as the Philippines. This study introduces the Tanawpamana Dataset, a repository of Philippine heritage site images with metadata based on the Talapamana registry of the National Commission for Culture and the Arts of the Philippines. We also introduce the Tanawpamana Benchmark, comprising 4,046 tasks designed to evaluate models' recognition and knowledge of heritage sites. Evaluating seven vision-language models, we find that they struggle more with fine-grained visual discrimination among similar heritage sites than with coarse recognition, and that their geographic knowledge is weaker when inferred from image inputs than from text.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.17596 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2610.17596v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17596 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words
Related coverage
ChinaHeritaQA: A Culturally-Grounded Visual Question Answering Dataset for World Heritage Sites in China
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026
KARAMEL: Knowledge-Aware Ranking for Multimodal Entity Linking in the Arts via Heterogeneous Graphs
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026
Lot Machine: Multimodal Lot Extraction from Auction Catalogs
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026
GoDeep: Annotation-Free Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Understanding via Language-Space Lifting
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026