aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical bottleneck in machine translation evaluation by replacing random sampling with a taxonomy-aware method that explicitly targets rare linguistic phenomena and document coherence. By optimizing the selection of test segments, TACTICS enables more robust system comparisons within fixed budgets while reducing false positives in quality gap detection. The approach advances the field of Machine Learning by ensuring evaluation metrics reflect the full operational space rather than corpus assembly artifacts.
TACTICS: Taxonomy-Aware Intelligent Corpus Sampling for Machine Translation
arXiv:2609.17956v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large-scale machine-translation (MT) systems are typically evaluated on random samples from a corpus whose distributional composition is an artifact of how it was assembled. Such a sample inherits the phenomena the collection happens to contain rather than the full space a system must handle, spanning rule-governed conventions (terminology, punctuation, currency formatting) and context-dependent phenomena (tone, honorifics, document-level coherence), and thus provides no coverage guarantee for assessing robustness. We propose TACTICS (Taxonomy-Aware Coverage-opTimized Intelligent Corpus Sampling), which recasts coverage as an explicit objective. TACTICS induces a hierarchical taxonomy from a locale style guide, classifies segments against it, and selects a fixed-budget subset jointly optimizing coverage of rare categories, document-level coherence, and distributional fidelity to the full corpus. Applied to MT evaluation across four translation directions, TACTICS improves coverage of rare categories over lexical and embedding-based selection. By targeting the phenomena that separate systems, TACTICS makes a fixed evaluation budget go further, recovering the true system ranking from far fewer segments than random sampling wherever a real quality gap exists and never signaling a difference where none exists.
Abstract:Large-scale machine-translation (MT) systems are typically evaluated on random samples from a corpus whose distributional composition is an artifact of how it was assembled. Such a sample inherits the phenomena the collection happens to contain rather than the full space a system must handle, spanning rule-governed conventions (terminology, punctuation, currency formatting) and context-dependent phenomena (tone, honorifics, document-level coherence), and thus provides no coverage guarantee for assessing robustness. We propose TACTICS (Taxonomy-Aware Coverage-opTimized Intelligent Corpus Sampling), which recasts coverage as an explicit objective. TACTICS induces a hierarchical taxonomy from a locale style guide, classifies segments against it, and selects a fixed-budget subset jointly optimizing coverage of rare categories, document-level coherence, and distributional fidelity to the full corpus. Applied to MT evaluation across four translation directions, TACTICS improves coverage of rare categories over lexical and embedding-based selection. By targeting the phenomena that separate systems, TACTICS makes a fixed evaluation budget go further, recovering the true system ranking from far fewer segments than random sampling wherever a real quality gap exists and never signaling a difference where none exists.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.17956 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.17956v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17956 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words
Related coverage

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026

The Alignment Journal: Organization, Personnel, and Scope
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 1, 2026