aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the critical sim-to-real gap in robotics by extending disturbance observer principles to handle deviations in both analytical models and learned world models. By separating state-effect and cost disturbances, the proposed sampling-based approach improves control performance across diverse environments without relying solely on explicit plant models. The work represents a significant methodological advance for deploying robust AI-driven robotic systems where environmental assumptions inevitably diverge from reality.
Tackling Sim-to-Real Mismatch Through Sampling-Based Disturbance Observers: From Analytical Models to Learned World Models
arXiv:2610.04896v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robotic controllers increasingly rely on analytical models, simulators, cost-query interfaces, and learned world models. However, physical deployment can deviate from nominal assumptions, and additional disturbances may arise even when the model itself is accurate. In control systems, disturbance observers (DOB) are widely used to estimate such unmeasured effects from nominal models and measured feedback. Classical DOB formulations are generally built around explicit plant models. This paper develops the sampling-based disturbance observer (SDOB), extending the DOB principle to a broader range of models, including simulators and learned world models, through state-rollout or cost-query interfaces. SDOB separates two observable channels: state-effect disturbances, for which the feedback state differs from its prediction, and cost disturbances, for which the same query state receives different costs as the perceived environment changes. Diverse simulation and real-robot experiments across traditional and learned models demonstrate the effectiveness of SDOB in compensating for sim-to-real mismatch and improving control performance.
Abstract:Robotic controllers increasingly rely on analytical models, simulators, cost-query interfaces, and learned world models. However, physical deployment can deviate from nominal assumptions, and additional disturbances may arise even when the model itself is accurate. In control systems, disturbance observers (DOB) are widely used to estimate such unmeasured effects from nominal models and measured feedback. Classical DOB formulations are generally built around explicit plant models. This paper develops the sampling-based disturbance observer (SDOB), extending the DOB principle to a broader range of models, including simulators and learned world models, through state-rollout or cost-query interfaces. SDOB separates two observable channels: state-effect disturbances, for which the feedback state differs from its prediction, and cost disturbances, for which the same query state receives different costs as the perceived environment changes. Diverse simulation and real-robot experiments across traditional and learned models demonstrate the effectiveness of SDOB in compensating for sim-to-real mismatch and improving control performance.
15 pages, 14 figures, 7 tables. Project website: this https URL
Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2610.04896 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.04896v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04896 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words
Related coverage

The Machines that Make the Machines
NVIDIA · Oct 7, 2026

Building trust in AI agents: A production-ready evaluation framework with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Oct 16, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026