Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces T-SMART, a neurosymbolic framework that isolates the distinct contributions of language reasoning, deterministic computation, and perception in tool-augmented time-series question answering. By decoupling these roles, the study demonstrates that reliable numerical execution drives the majority of accuracy gains over direct LLM reasoning on serialized data. This work provides a critical methodological advance for understanding component efficacy within complex AI systems handling quantitative tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

T-SMART: Mechanism-Level Attribution for Tool-Augmented Time-Series Question Answering

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.14142v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can struggle with time-series question answering (TS-QA), especially when numerical signals are serialized as text and require explicit computation. Tool-augmented approaches improve performance, but existing systems often intertwine language reasoning, computation, and perception, making it difficult to determine which components drive the gains. We present T-SMART, a neurosymbolic framework that separates these roles: a frozen LLM interprets questions and selects operations, deterministic tools perform numerical computation, and structured perception is invoked only when needed. Controlled paired ablations show that deterministic computation provides the dominant benefit, improving accuracy by 31.7 percentage points over direct LLM reasoning on serialized time series, while language understanding and perception offer smaller complementary gains. These results indicate that tool-augmented TS-QA benefits primarily from reliable numerical execution rather than additional language-model reasoning and provide a controlled framework for analyzing component contributions in neurosymbolic time-series systems.

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can struggle with time-series question answering (TS-QA), especially when numerical signals are serialized as text and require explicit computation. Tool-augmented approaches improve performance, but existing systems often intertwine language reasoning, computation, and perception, making it difficult to determine which components drive the gains. We present T-SMART, a neurosymbolic framework that separates these roles: a frozen LLM interprets questions and selects operations, deterministic tools perform numerical computation, and structured perception is invoked only when needed. Controlled paired ablations show that deterministic computation provides the dominant benefit, improving accuracy by 31.7 percentage points over direct LLM reasoning on serialized time series, while language understanding and perception offer smaller complementary gains. These results indicate that tool-augmented TS-QA benefits primarily from reliable numerical execution rather than additional language-model reasoning and provide a controlled framework for analyzing component contributions in neurosymbolic time-series systems.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.14142 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.14142v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14142 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 236 words

Related coverage