aiqbench analysis
This study optimizes a shared infrastructure for Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution (CV-QKD) by integrating secret-key generation with classical data transport over a single fiber. The research quantifies the trade-offs between hardware consolidation, spectral leakage, and receiver bandwidth to determine that increasing bandwidth offers greater throughput gains than further separating channels in metropolitan networks. These findings provide a concrete integration path for scaling quantum-secure communication links while minimizing optical resource duplication.
System-Design Optimization of a Single-Transmitter, Single-Fiber QKD-based ITS Communication Link
arXiv:2610.13359v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deploying QKD-based secure communication at scale requires reducing duplicated optical hardware while preserving the rate of protected user data. Earlier studies established the physical feasibility of carrying CV-QKD and classical signals over shared infrastructure, motivating a quantitative comparison between optical hardware savings and the OTP-encrypted rate. We perform this comparison by defining the secure communication rate (SCR) as the rate jointly supported by secret-key generation and classical transport, and using it to optimize a shared discrete-modulation CV-QKD link. The model combines a binomial 64-QAM security bound with a trusted receiver, protocol traffic, spectral leakage - optical power leaking into the quantum receive band - and Raman scattering. At 25 km, the asymptotic model gives an optimized SCR of 12.079 Mbps, compared with 12.095 Mbps for a separated-link reference, while reducing the transmitter and fiber counts from two to one each in the modeled direction. Increasing channel separation suppresses spectral leakage, but the resulting SCR gain diminishes once receiver bandwidth limits the rate. Under the adopted receiver-noise law, increasing the bandwidth budget from 350 to 750 MHz raises the projected 25-km SCR to 24.535 Mbps despite higher trusted electronic noise. For the studied metropolitan link, sharing saves optical resources with little rate loss, while receiver-bandwidth improvements provide greater benefit than further spectral separation. Together, these results suggest an integration path: share the transmitter and fiber, limit unwanted classical power in the quantum receive band, and increase usable receiver bandwidth where the noise budget permits.
Abstract:Deploying QKD-based secure communication at scale requires reducing duplicated optical hardware while preserving the rate of protected user data. Earlier studies established the physical feasibility of carrying CV-QKD and classical signals over shared infrastructure, motivating a quantitative comparison between optical hardware savings and the OTP-encrypted rate. We perform this comparison by defining the secure communication rate (SCR) as the rate jointly supported by secret-key generation and classical transport, and using it to optimize a shared discrete-modulation CV-QKD link. The model combines a binomial 64-QAM security bound with a trusted receiver, protocol traffic, spectral leakage - optical power leaking into the quantum receive band - and Raman scattering. At 25 km, the asymptotic model gives an optimized SCR of 12.079 Mbps, compared with 12.095 Mbps for a separated-link reference, while reducing the transmitter and fiber counts from two to one each in the modeled direction. Increasing channel separation suppresses spectral leakage, but the resulting SCR gain diminishes once receiver bandwidth limits the rate. Under the adopted receiver-noise law, increasing the bandwidth budget from 350 to 750 MHz raises the projected 25-km SCR to 24.535 Mbps despite higher trusted electronic noise. For the studied metropolitan link, sharing saves optical resources with little rate loss, while receiver-bandwidth improvements provide greater benefit than further spectral separation. Together, these results suggest an integration path: share the transmitter and fiber, limit unwanted classical power in the quantum receive band, and increase usable receiver bandwidth where the noise budget permits.
arXiv:2610.13359 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.13359v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13359 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 334 words
Related coverage

Adaptive optics fix turbulence for secure quantum links over 11 miles
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 26, 2026
SEMICON Taiwan 2026 Kicks Off: AI Chip Bottleneck Is Wires Connecting Them
techtimes.com · Aug 31, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026