aiqbench analysis
This arXiv paper studies how to select instruction-tuning data for language models using neuron relevance from AttnLRP attribution. It compares two criteria: one that measures how broadly positive relevance is spread across neurons (ERS) and one that measures its average strength (PRM). The results suggest that the distribution of relevance, not just its magnitude, changes which samples get chosen, though the evidence rests on three models and five benchmarks.
Support or Magnitude? Characterizing Neuron Relevance for Instruction Data Selection
arXiv:2610.16531v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model-internal signals, such as neuron activations and gradients, have been used for instruction data selection, yet how neuron relevance should be characterized remains underexplored. In particular, should selection prioritize the magnitude of relevance or how broadly it is distributed across neurons? To investigate this question, we construct sample-level relevance profiles using AttnLRP-guided attribution and introduce two complementary criteria: Effective Relevance Support (ERS), which measures the effective support of positive relevance, and Positive Relevance Magnitude (PRM), which captures its average strength. Our analyses reveal that these characterizations produce distinct sample rankings and selection preferences despite sharing the same underlying relevance profiles. On Qwen2 models, PRM exhibits stronger associations with activation-based selection, whereas ERS produces substantially different rankings. These differences extend to task composition, within-task sample preferences, and semantic selection patterns, with varying degrees of agreement across backbones. Experiments across three language models and five downstream benchmarks demonstrate the practical value of relevance-guided selection, with ERS achieving the best overall average performance rank among the evaluated methods. Our findings highlight that how neuron relevance is distributed and characterized, rather than its magnitude alone, matters for instruction data selection.
Title:Support or Magnitude? Characterizing Neuron Relevance for Instruction Data Selection
Abstract:Model-internal signals, such as neuron activations and gradients, have been used for instruction data selection, yet how neuron relevance should be characterized remains underexplored. In particular, should selection prioritize the magnitude of relevance or how broadly it is distributed across neurons? To investigate this question, we construct sample-level relevance profiles using AttnLRP-guided attribution and introduce two complementary criteria: Effective Relevance Support (ERS), which measures the effective support of positive relevance, and Positive Relevance Magnitude (PRM), which captures its average strength. Our analyses reveal that these characterizations produce distinct sample rankings and selection preferences despite sharing the same underlying relevance profiles. On Qwen2 models, PRM exhibits stronger associations with activation-based selection, whereas ERS produces substantially different rankings. These differences extend to task composition, within-task sample preferences, and semantic selection patterns, with varying degrees of agreement across backbones. Experiments across three language models and five downstream benchmarks demonstrate the practical value of relevance-guided selection, with ERS achieving the best overall average performance rank among the evaluated methods. Our findings highlight that how neuron relevance is distributed and characterized, rather than its magnitude alone, matters for instruction data selection.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.16531 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.16531v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16531 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
A Mechanistic Study of AI-Text Detection Neurons in Frozen BERT: Sparse Probing and Activation Patching on RAID
arXiv · Sep 28, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026