aiqbench analysis
This research establishes that policy gradient methods can effectively solve stabilization control tasks using only zeroth-order reward terms, avoiding the hyperparameter sensitivity often introduced by first-order velocity terms. The study provides a principled framework for designing robust reward functions in robotic deep reinforcement learning by distinguishing intrinsic control objectives from numerical regularizers. These findings offer actionable guidance for practitioners aiming to reduce tuning complexity in modern robotic control systems.
Sufficiency of Zeroth-Order Reward Shaping for Policy Gradient in Stabilization Control
arXiv:2609.34695v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reward shaping is fundamental to modern robotic control with deep reinforcement learning (RL), yet practitioners still rely heavily on heuristic principles borrowed from classical optimal control and trajectory optimization. Existing methods rarely distinguish reward terms that are intrinsic to the control objective from numerical regularizers, leading to brittle hyperparameter tuning. To determine which quantities a reward must contain, we study the stabilization control problem with a focus on zeroth-order (configuration) and first-order (velocity) information. We theoretically and empirically demonstrate that policy gradient methods can successfully solve stabilization tasks without first-order reward terms, adding such terms can instead introduce severe sensitivity as their scale grows. Conversely, our findings confirm that reward functions must be zeroth-order complete over goal-relevant coordinates, while the first-order state remains necessary in the policy observation under our low-dissipation assumptions. Overall, these results provide actionable and principled guidance for reward design in robotic RL.
Abstract:Reward shaping is fundamental to modern robotic control with deep reinforcement learning (RL), yet practitioners still rely heavily on heuristic principles borrowed from classical optimal control and trajectory optimization. Existing methods rarely distinguish reward terms that are intrinsic to the control objective from numerical regularizers, leading to brittle hyperparameter tuning. To determine which quantities a reward must contain, we study the stabilization control problem with a focus on zeroth-order (configuration) and first-order (velocity) information. We theoretically and empirically demonstrate that policy gradient methods can successfully solve stabilization tasks without first-order reward terms, adding such terms can instead introduce severe sensitivity as their scale grows. Conversely, our findings confirm that reward functions must be zeroth-order complete over goal-relevant coordinates, while the first-order state remains necessary in the policy observation under our low-dissipation assumptions. Overall, these results provide actionable and principled guidance for reward design in robotic RL.
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.34695 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.34695v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34695 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 242 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026
Models Can't Remember Their Training. Neither Can You.
LessWrong · Jul 19, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026