aiqbench analysis
This research evaluates quantization trade-offs for machine translation models, revealing how document-chunking strategies significantly impact latency-throughput efficiency alongside quality retention. The study highlights critical differences in robustness between model families under low-bit precision and challenges existing benchmarks that fail to capture long-context dynamics during inference deployment.
Studying quantization trade-offs for efficient inference deployment in machine translation
arXiv:2607.29397v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deploying large language models in realistic server environments poses challenges, as the system needs to provide high-quality responses with low latency. Quantization is a common approach to reduce the memory footprint and improve inference efficiency, yet its impact on latency and throughput is rarely evaluated under controlled, orchestration-level workloads. In this work we study the quantization trade-offs of two translation model families, EuroLLM \citep{martins2025eurollm} and Hy-MT2 \citep{zheng2026hy} across five models ranging from 1.7B to 22B for efficient deployment on a single A100 or H100 GPU. We demonstrate that combining a document-chunking strategy with W4A8 or W8A8 quantization improves the latency-throughput Pareto-curve under a wide range of workloads. Furthermore, since standard machine translation (MT) benchmarks rely on isolated sentences and fail to capture long-context dynamics, we introduce a document-level evaluation from WMT24++ to assess how text chunking strategies affect translation quality under quantization. Our results reveal that standard segment-level evaluation can fail to predict the interaction between quantization and long-context document translation. While Hy-MT2 remains robust under quantization, EuroLLM shows strong sensitivity and translation quality collapses rapidly for all considered quantization formats. Overall, our experiments show that the trade-off between inference efficiency and translation quality depends not only on the quantization format, but also on the choice of text chunking strategy.
Abstract:Deploying large language models in realistic server environments poses challenges, as the system needs to provide high-quality responses with low latency. Quantization is a common approach to reduce the memory footprint and improve inference efficiency, yet its impact on latency and throughput is rarely evaluated under controlled, orchestration-level workloads. In this work we study the quantization trade-offs of two translation model families, EuroLLM \citep{martins2025eurollm} and Hy-MT2 \citep{zheng2026hy} across five models ranging from 1.7B to 22B for efficient deployment on a single A100 or H100 GPU. We demonstrate that combining a document-chunking strategy with W4A8 or W8A8 quantization improves the latency-throughput Pareto-curve under a wide range of workloads. Furthermore, since standard machine translation (MT) benchmarks rely on isolated sentences and fail to capture long-context dynamics, we introduce a document-level evaluation from WMT24++ to assess how text chunking strategies affect translation quality under quantization. Our results reveal that standard segment-level evaluation can fail to predict the interaction between quantization and long-context document translation. While Hy-MT2 remains robust under quantization, EuroLLM shows strong sensitivity and translation quality collapses rapidly for all considered quantization formats. Overall, our experiments show that the trade-off between inference efficiency and translation quality depends not only on the quantization format, but also on the choice of text chunking strategy.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Performance (cs.PF)
arXiv:2607.29397 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.29397v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.29397 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 307 words
Related coverage
dMX: Differentiable Mixed-Precision Assignment for Low-Precision Floating-Point Formats
arXiv · Jun 5, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · Sep 21, 2026
How Small Can You Go? A Controlled Study of LoRA Rank, Target Modules, and Quantization Trade-offs for Text-to-SQL on a 60M-Parameter Model
arXiv · Jul 29, 2026