Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study investigates the specific failure modes introduced when converting standard attention layers to KDA linear-attention mechanisms in a 0.6B parameter model. Researchers discovered that while perplexity metrics remained stable, the models exhibited severe "interface injury" by defaulting to option labels rather than content; this was successfully repaired using format-targeted distillation and specific optimizer adjustments like FP32-master usage. The work provides critical engineering insights for deploying efficient linear-attention architectures without sacrificing reasoning accuracy or introducing hidden bias artifacts.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Stuck on "A": Diagnosing and Repairing Interface Injury in Attention-to-KDA Linearization of a 0.6B Language Model

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.02689v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We convert 21 of 28 full-attention layers of Qwen3-0.6B-Base into KDA (Kimi Delta Attention) linear-attention layers on a single consumer-grade GPU budget, and ask a simple question: what exactly does the conversion break? After surgery, hidden-state alignment and end-to-end KL distillation drive the student close to its teacher in perplexity, yet multiple-choice accuracy stays near random chance (25-29% vs. the teacher's 50.6% on C-Eval). Using a four-permutation diagnostic that rotates answer options while holding content fixed, we show the model sticks to option labels (predicting "A" 81% of the time; 106/161 questions keep the same label under all four rotations) rather than following answer content -- an interface injury that standard distillation metrics cannot see. A 1,000-step format-targeted completion-only KL stage repairs the interface (+12.48 points on C-Eval, label-stickiness roughly halved), after which persona SFT and one round of on-policy DPO preserve benchmark scores within noise. We release code, weights, recipes, and the full audit trail, and distill the engineering lessons -- including an FP32-master failure mode in which bf16 optimizer updates are silently swallowed -- that made convergence possible at this budget.

Title:Stuck on "A": Diagnosing and Repairing Interface Injury in Attention-to-KDA Linearization of a 0.6B Language Model

Abstract:We convert 21 of 28 full-attention layers of Qwen3-0.6B-Base into KDA (Kimi Delta Attention) linear-attention layers on a single consumer-grade GPU budget, and ask a simple question: what exactly does the conversion break? After surgery, hidden-state alignment and end-to-end KL distillation drive the student close to its teacher in perplexity, yet multiple-choice accuracy stays near random chance (25-29% vs. the teacher's 50.6% on C-Eval). Using a four-permutation diagnostic that rotates answer options while holding content fixed, we show the model sticks to option labels (predicting "A" 81% of the time; 106/161 questions keep the same label under all four rotations) rather than following answer content -- an interface injury that standard distillation metrics cannot see. A 1,000-step format-targeted completion-only KL stage repairs the interface (+12.48 points on C-Eval, label-stickiness roughly halved), after which persona SFT and one round of on-policy DPO preserve benchmark scores within noise. We release code, weights, recipes, and the full audit trail, and distill the engineering lessons -- including an FP32-master failure mode in which bf16 optimizer updates are silently swallowed -- that made convergence possible at this budget.

Code and models: this https URL ; this https URL . A version of this preprint is archived on Zenodo (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21722356)

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.02689 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.02689v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02689 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 317 words

Related coverage