Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

WORLDS introduces a novel agentic framework that uses parallel reasoning and persistent graph states to resolve ambiguous evidence for long-horizon robotic search tasks. By integrating multimodal observation verification, the system significantly improves navigation success rates in complex urban environments compared to current baselines. This work advances the field of embodied AI by demonstrating how language-guided discovery can be grounded in real-time perception and geospatial data.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Structured World-State Reasoning for Agentic Robotic Search

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.23841v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon robotic search must resolve natural language against heterogeneous, incomplete, and often ambiguous evidence: textual information, prior maps, and observations arriving over time. The core challenge is to contextualize these streams and decide where to gather evidence before selecting a target. We present WORLDS: World-state Observation and Reasoning for Language-guided Discovery and Search, a framework that grounds reasoning in a persistent graph initialized from geospatial priors and updated by perception. Parallel Reasoners maintain competing candidate interpretations and request evidence to distinguish between them. We collect and process the requested observations with a multimodal Examiner, after which a Judge selects a grounded target or requests another pass. WORLDS achieves 51.8% navigation success across all 5,311 CityNav test episodes, the highest reported success rate, exceeding the previous published best by 15.7 percentage points under an OSM-only, high-resolution orthographic protocol. On 1,000 shared episodes, it achieves 50.0% versus 27.9% for the strongest adapted baseline using the same model, prior, sensing stack, and movement budget. Observation-based verification by the Examiner contributes 5.9 points of this success, and at a reduced reasoning-effort setting WORLDS still exceeds the adapted GeoNav baseline by 18.8 points while generating fewer tokens. We also demonstrate WORLDS on a quadrotor, which flies the generated sensing waypoints and grounds three language targets, including a vehicle absent from the map, from its onboard imagery.

Abstract:Long-horizon robotic search must resolve natural language against heterogeneous, incomplete, and often ambiguous evidence: textual information, prior maps, and observations arriving over time. The core challenge is to contextualize these streams and decide where to gather evidence before selecting a target. We present WORLDS: World-state Observation and Reasoning for Language-guided Discovery and Search, a framework that grounds reasoning in a persistent graph initialized from geospatial priors and updated by perception. Parallel Reasoners maintain competing candidate interpretations and request evidence to distinguish between them. We collect and process the requested observations with a multimodal Examiner, after which a Judge selects a grounded target or requests another pass. WORLDS achieves 51.8% navigation success across all 5,311 CityNav test episodes, the highest reported success rate, exceeding the previous published best by 15.7 percentage points under an OSM-only, high-resolution orthographic protocol. On 1,000 shared episodes, it achieves 50.0% versus 27.9% for the strongest adapted baseline using the same model, prior, sensing stack, and movement budget. Observation-based verification by the Examiner contributes 5.9 points of this success, and at a reduced reasoning-effort setting WORLDS still exceeds the adapted GeoNav baseline by 18.8 points while generating fewer tokens. We also demonstrate WORLDS on a quadrotor, which flies the generated sensing waypoints and grounds three language targets, including a vehicle absent from the map, from its onboard imagery.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.23841 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.23841v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.23841 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 314 words

Related coverage