aiqbench analysis
This research establishes rigorous Gaussian approximations for stochastic gradient descent trajectories under constant learning rates, enabling precise whole-trajectory inference rather than just point-wise limits. By addressing heavy-tailed noise and initialization biases, the work provides theoretical tools for risk control and simultaneous inference in deep learning optimization.
Strong Gaussian Approximation of Constant-Learning-Rate SGD: Bias and Trajectory Inference
arXiv:2610.14567v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper develops strong Gaussian approximations (KMT type) for constant learning rate stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We work with heavy tailed noise and assume that the number of iterates grows and the learning rate shrinks simultaneously. Our work constructs simple Gaussian processes on the same space and bounds, in probability, the maximum difference between the SGD errors and their respective limits. While there exist central limit theorems for constant rate SGD centered at the optimum, these only provide individual iterate inference. By contrast, our quenched KMT approximations allow for finite sample, simultaneous, whole-trajectory-level inference and imply stochastic process convergence (Functional Central Limit Theorems (FCLTs)). For accumulated errors centered at the true optimum, we first obtain a KMT-type approximation bound when the learning rate scales as $\gamma_n=\frac{c}{\sqrt n}+o(n^{-1/2})$ for a constant $c \in \mathbb{R}^+$ and $n$ iterations. The result reveals a trade off between controlling the bias of SGD and the initialization effect, with no learning rate scaling generally making both contributions vanish in the accumulated error limit. To eliminate these contributions, we consider a Burn in scheme and Richardson-Romberg extrapolation and prove respective KMT and FCLT theorems. We also prove a finite-horizon KMT-type approximation and FCLT for the rescaled iterate trajectory to a stationary Ornstein--Uhlenbeck (OU) process. We consider applications in risk control and simultaneous inference and perform simulations to illustrate our results.
Abstract:This paper develops strong Gaussian approximations (KMT type) for constant learning rate stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We work with heavy tailed noise and assume that the number of iterates grows and the learning rate shrinks simultaneously. Our work constructs simple Gaussian processes on the same space and bounds, in probability, the maximum difference between the SGD errors and their respective limits. While there exist central limit theorems for constant rate SGD centered at the optimum, these only provide individual iterate inference. By contrast, our quenched KMT approximations allow for finite sample, simultaneous, whole-trajectory-level inference and imply stochastic process convergence (Functional Central Limit Theorems (FCLTs)). For accumulated errors centered at the true optimum, we first obtain a KMT-type approximation bound when the learning rate scales as $\gamma_n=\frac{c}{\sqrt n}+o(n^{-1/2})$ for a constant $c \in \mathbb{R}^+$ and $n$ iterations. The result reveals a trade off between controlling the bias of SGD and the initialization effect, with no learning rate scaling generally making both contributions vanish in the accumulated error limit. To eliminate these contributions, we consider a Burn in scheme and Richardson-Romberg extrapolation and prove respective KMT and FCLT theorems. We also prove a finite-horizon KMT-type approximation and FCLT for the rescaled iterate trajectory to a stationary Ornstein--Uhlenbeck (OU) process. We consider applications in risk control and simultaneous inference and perform simulations to illustrate our results.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.14567 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2610.14567v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14567 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 318 words
Related coverage
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026