aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a strict-saddle landscape for low-tubal-rank tensor sensing, proving the absence of spurious local minima under specific Fourier multi-rank profiles. The study reveals that local geometry is dictated by Fourier-slice ranks rather than tubal rank alone, with nonuniform ranks creating quartically flat directions due to hidden frequency-wise overparameterization. These findings clarify the optimization dynamics of tensor factorization models and their sensitivity to rank distribution across frequencies.
Strict-Saddle Landscapes and Multi-Rank Geometry in Low-Tubal-Rank Tensor Sensing
arXiv:2609.37865v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the optimization landscape of low-tubal-rank tensor sensing through a balanced factorization. Under a tubal restricted isometry condition, we establish a quantitative strict-saddle landscape with no spurious local minima for arbitrary Fourier multi-rank profiles. We further show that the local geometry depends on the Fourier-slice ranks rather than the tubal rank alone. Uniform ranks yield quadratic growth transverse to the solution orbit, whereas nonuniform ranks produce quartically flat directions through hidden frequency-wise overparameterization, even when the factor width equals the exact tubal rank. Numerical experiments illustrate the global optimization behavior and the contrasting local geometries.
Abstract:We study the optimization landscape of low-tubal-rank tensor sensing through a balanced factorization. Under a tubal restricted isometry condition, we establish a quantitative strict-saddle landscape with no spurious local minima for arbitrary Fourier multi-rank profiles. We further show that the local geometry depends on the Fourier-slice ranks rather than the tubal rank alone. Uniform ranks yield quadratic growth transverse to the solution orbit, whereas nonuniform ranks produce quartically flat directions through hidden frequency-wise overparameterization, even when the factor width equals the exact tubal rank. Numerical experiments illustrate the global optimization behavior and the contrasting local geometries.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2609.37865 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.37865v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.37865 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 194 words
Related coverage
Nonconvex Matrix Factorization is Geodesically Convex: Global Landscape Analysis for Fixed-rank Matrix Optimization From a Riemannian Perspective
arXiv · Jul 21, 2026
The N-5 Scaling Law: Topological Dimensionality Reduction in the Optimal Design of Fully-actuated Multirotors
arXiv · Sep 28, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026