aiqbench analysis
This research analyzes the game-theoretic dynamics of competitive quantum miners operating within a classical Bitcoin network, concluding that aggressive strategies yield negligible impacts on the 51% attack threshold. The study provides critical insights for evaluating the actual security posture and threat landscape of Proof-of-Work cryptocurrencies against emerging quantum capabilities. It bridges theoretical physics with practical cryptographic resilience by modeling realistic mining restart protocols rather than idealized single-shot scenarios.
Strategies for quantum-enabled Bitcoin miners
arXiv:2607.23952v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the impact that two miners equipped with quantum computers purpose-built for quantum Bitcoin mining will have on the 51% attack threshold of the Bitcoin network, given that the miners are playing a competitive game against each other to be the first to mine a block. We extend an existing game-theoretic framework for Bitcoin mining and compute the resultant payoff matrices. From these payoff matrices, we determine optimal quantum mining strategies for two non-colluding and aggressive quantum miners with multiple opportunities at finding a valid block in an otherwise classical Bitcoin network. We show that these optimal quantum mining strategies have a negligible effect on the 51% attack threshold. The novelty of our work is the inclusion of the Aggressive Quantum Mining Strategy and the realistic approach of allowing the quantum miners to restart their search if their measurements do not yield a valid block when determining the optimal quantum mining strategies. Our result is important for evaluating quantum-mining threats on cryptocurrencies based on Proof-of-Work, e.g. Bitcoin
Abstract:We study the impact that two miners equipped with quantum computers purpose-built for quantum Bitcoin mining will have on the 51% attack threshold of the Bitcoin network, given that the miners are playing a competitive game against each other to be the first to mine a block. We extend an existing game-theoretic framework for Bitcoin mining and compute the resultant payoff matrices. From these payoff matrices, we determine optimal quantum mining strategies for two non-colluding and aggressive quantum miners with multiple opportunities at finding a valid block in an otherwise classical Bitcoin network. We show that these optimal quantum mining strategies have a negligible effect on the 51% attack threshold. The novelty of our work is the inclusion of the Aggressive Quantum Mining Strategy and the realistic approach of allowing the quantum miners to restart their search if their measurements do not yield a valid block when determining the optimal quantum mining strategies. Our result is important for evaluating quantum-mining threats on cryptocurrencies based on Proof-of-Work, e.g. Bitcoin
53 pages, 17 figures. Code available at this https URL
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
arXiv:2607.23952 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2607.23952v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23952 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 282 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Quantum computers need fewer resources to break blockchain keys
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 2, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026