aiqbench analysis
This research introduces Stochastic Semantic Evidence Graphs (SSEG) as a novel framework for tracing uncertainty propagation in AI agents from evidence retrieval to final generation. By modeling the workflow as a hierarchical stochastic DAG, the method quantifies how errors enter and spread through different components like RAG systems and prompting strategies without assuming source independence. This approach offers a rigorous mechanism for diagnosing governance triggers and validating whether an agent's output is qualified for use based on its provenance history.
Stochastic Semantic Evidence Graphs: Uncertainty Propagation and Governance for Agentic AI
arXiv:2609.29703v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-agent evaluations usually inspect a final answer, yet error may enter through evidence, retrieval, prompting, generation or decision mapping. We introduce a stochastic semantic evidence graph (SSEG), a hierarchical stochastic DAG whose language node expands into an autoregressive token subgraph and whose observable output may be a law over complete phrases. Semantic reduction and calibration are optional. We define graph-relative local defects and downstream edge influences, derive a pathwise bound on terminal error and use its nodewise terms to diagnose governance triggers. For source provenance, the graph preserves uncertain claim--passage relations and propagates sharp Fr\'echet bounds rather than assuming independence across sources. Across three open-weight architectures, information-equivalent changes materially alter complete-phrase laws. A controlled experiment yields no certificate violations in 5,000 cases; crossed-RAG and live Brave-retrieval experiments separate retrieval, presentation, source and interaction effects. SSEG therefore turns workflow provenance into a quantitative account of where uncertainty entered, how it propagated and whether an output is qualified for use.
Abstract:AI-agent evaluations usually inspect a final answer, yet error may enter through evidence, retrieval, prompting, generation or decision mapping. We introduce a stochastic semantic evidence graph (SSEG), a hierarchical stochastic DAG whose language node expands into an autoregressive token subgraph and whose observable output may be a law over complete phrases. Semantic reduction and calibration are optional. We define graph-relative local defects and downstream edge influences, derive a pathwise bound on terminal error and use its nodewise terms to diagnose governance triggers. For source provenance, the graph preserves uncertain claim--passage relations and propagates sharp Fréchet bounds rather than assuming independence across sources. Across three open-weight architectures, information-equivalent changes materially alter complete-phrase laws. A controlled experiment yields no certificate violations in 5,000 cases; crossed-RAG and live Brave-retrieval experiments separate retrieval, presentation, source and interaction effects. SSEG therefore turns workflow provenance into a quantitative account of where uncertainty entered, how it propagated and whether an output is qualified for use.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.29703 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.29703v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29703 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 259 words
Related coverage

Article: Agentic Fitness Functions: Extending Evolutionary Architecture Beyond Deterministic Rules
InfoQ · Aug 17, 2026

AXRP Episode 50 - Eli Lifland on AI 2027
LessWrong · Aug 3, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026

Graph-centric agentic intelligence
Amazon Science · Oct 1, 2026