aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Stochastic Grouping Conformal Prediction (SGCP), a novel framework designed to address subgroup reliability gaps in uncertainty quantification without relying on sensitive demographic attributes. By learning a stochastic grouping map, the method ensures distribution-free coverage guarantees across diverse populations while mitigating the performance inflation caused by worst-case subgroup bottlenecks. Experimental results demonstrate that SGCP effectively reduces coverage disparities and maintains compact prediction sets compared to existing baselines.
Stochastic Grouping Conformal Prediction for Effective Subgroup Reliability
arXiv:2610.11957v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conformal prediction offers a distribution-free coverage guarantee, making it especially attractive for clinical applications. Standard conformal prediction, however, provides such guarantees only at the population level, and its prediction sets can exhibit coverage disparities across clinically important subgroups. A natural remedy is to calibrate within predefined groups. However, this can require access to sensitive subgroup attributes and is prone to a worst-group bottleneck: protecting the most difficult subgroup can inflate prediction sets for all, increasing cognitive burden on decision makers. To this end, we propose Stochastic Grouping Conformal Prediction (SGCP), a conformal framework for subgroup-reliable uncertainty quantification. It learns a stochastic grouping map that allows each sample to draw calibration information from others with similar calibration behavior, yielding a local score law that boosts reliability across subpopulations. We prove that SGCP retains the standard coverage guarantee. Experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks show that it consistently reduces subgroup coverage gaps while achieving smaller or comparable prediction set sizes relative to existing baselines.
Abstract:Conformal prediction offers a distribution-free coverage guarantee, making it especially attractive for clinical applications. Standard conformal prediction, however, provides such guarantees only at the population level, and its prediction sets can exhibit coverage disparities across clinically important subgroups. A natural remedy is to calibrate within predefined groups. However, this can require access to sensitive subgroup attributes and is prone to a worst-group bottleneck: protecting the most difficult subgroup can inflate prediction sets for all, increasing cognitive burden on decision makers. To this end, we propose Stochastic Grouping Conformal Prediction (SGCP), a conformal framework for subgroup-reliable uncertainty quantification. It learns a stochastic grouping map that allows each sample to draw calibration information from others with similar calibration behavior, yielding a local score law that boosts reliability across subpopulations. We prove that SGCP retains the standard coverage guarantee. Experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks show that it consistently reduces subgroup coverage gaps while achieving smaller or comparable prediction set sizes relative to existing baselines.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.11957 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.11957v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11957 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 259 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026
Reliability-Centered Evaluation of Sparse Longitudinal CT Lesion-Size Forecasting with Conformal Interval Calibration and Gompertz-Inspired Regularization
arXiv · Sep 21, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026