aiqbench analysis
This research resolves the longstanding debate regarding whether momentum in Stochastic Gradient Descent degrades generalization by proving its algorithmic stability under broad conditions. The authors establish tight bounds that apply to any momentum parameter without requiring strict Lipschitz continuity of loss functions, offering a more robust theoretical foundation for training deep models.
Stochastic Gradient Descent with Momentum is Algorithmically Stable
arXiv:2605.28517v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Stochastic gradient descent with momentum (SGDM) is one of the most widely used optimization algorithms in machine learning. While optimization properties of SGDM have been extensively studied in the literature, it remains insufficiently understood whether and when SGDM can generalize well to unseen data. In particular, it has been conjectured that while momentum accelerates training, it may degrade generalization. In this paper, we close this gap by developing a comprehensive generalization analysis of SGDM through the lens of algorithmic stability. More specifically, we introduce a generalized SGDM framework that encompasses both Polyak's and Nesterov's momentum schemes, and establish tight on-average model stability bounds for smooth and convex problems. Notably, the obtained bounds exploit small optimization error bounds along the trajectory, apply to any momentum parameter in the interval $[0, 1)$, and do not require the commonly assumed Lipschitzness of loss functions. We further derive optimization error bounds for the generalized SGDM, and combine them with our generalization analyses to obtain optimal excess population risk bounds for SGDM with both Polyak's and Nesterov's momentum.
Abstract:Stochastic gradient descent with momentum (SGDM) is one of the most widely used optimization algorithms in machine learning. While optimization properties of SGDM have been extensively studied in the literature, it remains insufficiently understood whether and when SGDM can generalize well to unseen data. In particular, it has been conjectured that while momentum accelerates training, it may degrade generalization. In this paper, we close this gap by developing a comprehensive generalization analysis of SGDM through the lens of algorithmic stability. More specifically, we introduce a generalized SGDM framework that encompasses both Polyak's and Nesterov's momentum schemes, and establish tight on-average model stability bounds for smooth and convex problems. Notably, the obtained bounds exploit small optimization error bounds along the trajectory, apply to any momentum parameter in the interval $[0, 1)$, and do not require the commonly assumed Lipschitzness of loss functions. We further derive optimization error bounds for the generalized SGDM, and combine them with our generalization analyses to obtain optimal excess population risk bounds for SGDM with both Polyak's and Nesterov's momentum.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2605.28517 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.28517v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28517 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 268 words
Related coverage
Almost Sure Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Methods with Clipping and Additive Noise
arXiv · Sep 14, 2026
The Implicit Bias of Steepest Descent with Mini-batch Stochastic Gradient
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026
Stability and Generalization of Stochastic Nonconvex Optimization under Heavy-Tailed Noise: From Gradient Norm to Goldstein Stationarity
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026

Three perspectives on corrigibility - shards, simulators, singular learning
LessWrong · Oct 16, 2026