Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This study empirically evaluates the stability of moral value profiles in large language models using the Norwegian MFQ-30, demonstrating that specific persona interventions can significantly align model outputs with target human populations. The research highlights critical limitations in current steering techniques, such as mid-layer activation methods that flatten rather than refine ethical dimensions, while also exposing risks like induced engagement artifacts known as cognitive phantoms. These findings provide essential insights for researchers aiming to build reliable and culturally grounded AI systems through rigorous psychometric validation.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Steering LLMs Responses Towards Moral Foundations on the Norwegian MFQ-30

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.21636v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent work applies human psychometric questionnaires to large language models to elicit moral and value profiles, but it is not clear whether these instruments measure anything stable in models or whether the resulting profiles can be moved toward a target human population. We administer the Norwegian Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ-30) to six open-weight LLMs and compare their foundation profiles to a sample of N = 1,282 Norwegian respondents. We test two steering interventions, prompt-level persona steering and activation-level ActAdd. Half the models engage with the questionnaire under our attention check. The other half default to flat or central-tendency outputs that look near-human on average without tracking item content. A neutral Nordic-respondent persona, written without any distributional information from the human sample, brings the engaging models 44-77% closer to the Norwegian mean in Mahalanobis $d^2$. One-pair ActAdd at a fixed mid-layer flattens the foundation profile rather than steering individual foundations. For at least one model the same persona that shifts the profile also induces engagement that was absent at baseline, a concrete instance of the cognitive phantoms that Peereboom et al. (2025) warn about.

Abstract:Recent work applies human psychometric questionnaires to large language models to elicit moral and value profiles, but it is not clear whether these instruments measure anything stable in models or whether the resulting profiles can be moved toward a target human population. We administer the Norwegian Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ-30) to six open-weight LLMs and compare their foundation profiles to a sample of N = 1,282 Norwegian respondents. We test two steering interventions, prompt-level persona steering and activation-level ActAdd. Half the models engage with the questionnaire under our attention check. The other half default to flat or central-tendency outputs that look near-human on average without tracking item content. A neutral Nordic-respondent persona, written without any distributional information from the human sample, brings the engaging models 44-77% closer to the Norwegian mean in Mahalanobis $d^2$. One-pair ActAdd at a fixed mid-layer flattens the foundation profile rather than steering individual foundations. For at least one model the same persona that shifts the profile also induces engagement that was absent at baseline, a concrete instance of the cognitive phantoms that Peereboom et al. (2025) warn about.

13 pages, 4 figures, 7 tables. Awarded best Paper Award at WNNLP 2026 (University of Oslo). Proceedings: this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)

arXiv:2609.21636 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.21636v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21636 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 305 words

Related coverage