aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a curvature-aware method for inference-time steering that uses influence functions to select data points based on their contribution to a concept's loss landscape, rather than relying on superficial token-level averages. By incorporating the geometry of the model's loss surface, the approach achieves more thematic control over outputs while better preserving overall model capabilities compared to existing activation transport baselines.
Steering by Influence: Curvature Aware Data Weighting for Activation Steering
arXiv:2610.06383v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inference-time steering offers cheap, fine-grained control over a language model's outputs by estimating a concept's representation in activation space and shifting activations towards it. Existing methods build these representations from activation averages over contrastive datasets. These averages incorporate unrelated concepts and noise, and are dominated by a few tokens, meaning the activation transport encodes token-level rather than thematic concepts. In this work, we steer towards examples that most express a concept thematically, rather than towards an expectation over all. We identify these examples using influence functions, which estimate how much each data point contributes to a model's representation of a concept. Unlike simple model activation similarity, they incorporate the curvature of the model's loss landscape, allowing them to capture concept-relevant relationships beyond superficial token-level similarity. We then propose influence-weighted activation transport, which uses optimal transport to steer activations of non-concept text towards those of concept text, weighting concept examples by their influence scores. We evaluate on toxicity suppression (Jigsaw), object-based concept induction (OneSec) and truthfulness induction (TruthfulQA), outperforming existing activation-transport baselines. We track capability after steering using perplexity and MMLU accuracy, finding that our method improves steering while largely preserving model quality. We further show that influence functions capture concept-relevant information that activation-based methods miss with the two approaches ranking data points significantly differently. Together, these results demonstrate the value of curvature-aware influence information for activation steering.
Abstract:Inference-time steering offers cheap, fine-grained control over a language model's outputs by estimating a concept's representation in activation space and shifting activations towards it. Existing methods build these representations from activation averages over contrastive datasets. These averages incorporate unrelated concepts and noise, and are dominated by a few tokens, meaning the activation transport encodes token-level rather than thematic concepts. In this work, we steer towards examples that most express a concept thematically, rather than towards an expectation over all. We identify these examples using influence functions, which estimate how much each data point contributes to a model's representation of a concept. Unlike simple model activation similarity, they incorporate the curvature of the model's loss landscape, allowing them to capture concept-relevant relationships beyond superficial token-level similarity. We then propose influence-weighted activation transport, which uses optimal transport to steer activations of non-concept text towards those of concept text, weighting concept examples by their influence scores. We evaluate on toxicity suppression (Jigsaw), object-based concept induction (OneSec) and truthfulness induction (TruthfulQA), outperforming existing activation-transport baselines. We track capability after steering using perplexity and MMLU accuracy, finding that our method improves steering while largely preserving model quality. We further show that influence functions capture concept-relevant information that activation-based methods miss with the two approaches ranking data points significantly differently. Together, these results demonstrate the value of curvature-aware influence information for activation steering.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.06383 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.06383v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06383 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 328 words
Related coverage
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026
Some Intuitions on Steering Vectors
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026
Value Leakage: An LLM’s Answers Are Silently Shaped by Its Own Values
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 31, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026