Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the reliability of attention-based explanations in multiple instance learning by introducing a selective inference framework for computational pathology. By accounting for data-dependent selection events, the method ensures valid statistical significance testing for high-attention instances without inflating Type-I errors. This advancement strengthens the trustworthiness of weakly supervised analysis in whole-slide image diagnostics.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Frontiers, Quantum Zeitgeist, InfoQ
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Statistical Testing for Multiple Instance Learning via Selective Inference with Applications to Computational Pathology

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.31712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multiple instance learning (MIL) is widely used in computational pathology because it enables weakly supervised analysis of whole-slide images (WSIs) without requiring patch-level annotations. In attention-based MIL, instances with high attention scores are often interpreted as diagnostically important regions and used as visual explanations. However, attention scores alone cannot determine whether selected high-attention instances are significantly different from normal instances, limiting the reliability of attention-based explanations. In this paper, we formulate the evaluation of high-attention instances as a statistical hypothesis testing problem. Specifically, we assess whether a selected high-attention instance significantly deviates from a representative normal reference instance selected based on feature similarity. A major challenge is that both the target instance and the reference instance are selected through data-dependent procedures, rendering standard hypothesis testing invalid. To address this issue, we introduce a selective inference (SI) framework that explicitly accounts for the selection events induced by attention-based instance selection and adaptive reference selection, thereby enabling the computation of valid selective $p$-values conditional on these events. Experiments demonstrate Type-I error control on synthetic and MNIST-based data and practical applicability to pathological WSIs, with higher statistical power than the conventional over-conditioning approach.

Abstract:Multiple instance learning (MIL) is widely used in computational pathology because it enables weakly supervised analysis of whole-slide images (WSIs) without requiring patch-level annotations. In attention-based MIL, instances with high attention scores are often interpreted as diagnostically important regions and used as visual explanations. However, attention scores alone cannot determine whether selected high-attention instances are significantly different from normal instances, limiting the reliability of attention-based explanations. In this paper, we formulate the evaluation of high-attention instances as a statistical hypothesis testing problem. Specifically, we assess whether a selected high-attention instance significantly deviates from a representative normal reference instance selected based on feature similarity. A major challenge is that both the target instance and the reference instance are selected through data-dependent procedures, rendering standard hypothesis testing invalid. To address this issue, we introduce a selective inference (SI) framework that explicitly accounts for the selection events induced by attention-based instance selection and adaptive reference selection, thereby enabling the computation of valid selective $p$-values conditional on these events. Experiments demonstrate Type-I error control on synthetic and MNIST-based data and practical applicability to pathological WSIs, with higher statistical power than the conventional over-conditioning approach.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2609.31712 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.31712v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31712 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words

Related coverage