aiqbench analysis
This paper provides a rigorous statistical learning theory justification for regularization, framing Occam's razor as a necessary trade-off between model fit and simplicity to ensure theoretical reliability rather than mere pragmatism or ontological assumptions. By establishing that preferring simpler models is essential for "what-you-see-is-what-you-get" guarantees in machine learning inference, the work bridges philosophical principles with concrete algorithmic implementation.
Statistical learning theory and Occam's razor: Regularization
arXiv:2608.04049v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The principle of Occam's razor, which instructs us to prefer simplicity in inductive inference, has attracted much scrutiny both in the philosophy of science and in machine learning. In either field, however, a justification for the principle has been elusive. In this paper, building on an earlier "core argument," I spell out a justification from statistical learning theory for the procedure of regularization: for trading off fit for simplicity. The means-ends argument is that in order to profit from theoretical reliability and "what-you-see-is-what-you-get" guarantees, one must implement a certain preference for simplicity over fit. This is a genuine methodological justification, which neither collapses to a purely pragmatic principle that we prefer simplicity for its own sake, nor to an ontological assumption that the truth is simple.
Abstract:The principle of Occam's razor, which instructs us to prefer simplicity in inductive inference, has attracted much scrutiny both in the philosophy of science and in machine learning. In either field, however, a justification for the principle has been elusive. In this paper, building on an earlier "core argument," I spell out a justification from statistical learning theory for the procedure of regularization: for trading off fit for simplicity. The means-ends argument is that in order to profit from theoretical reliability and "what-you-see-is-what-you-get" guarantees, one must implement a certain preference for simplicity over fit. This is a genuine methodological justification, which neither collapses to a purely pragmatic principle that we prefer simplicity for its own sake, nor to an ontological assumption that the truth is simple.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.04049 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2608.04049v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04049 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words
Related coverage

Why don’t machine learning research agents overfit?
Amazon Science · Sep 10, 2026
Benign interpolation and Occam's razor
arXiv · Aug 5, 2026
Prediction Under Imperfect Compression: A Theory of Approximate MDL
arXiv · Jun 5, 2026
Probabilistic Symbolic Regression for Equation Discovery via Operator-induced and Regularized Symbolic Forests
arXiv · Jul 29, 2026