aiqbench analysis
This research clarifies a critical nuance in continuous-variable quantum computing by demonstrating that stabilizer expectation values provide only an upper bound, not a guarantee, for the fidelity of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states. Consequently, relying solely on stabilizer measurements can be misleading when assessing the quality of qubits encoded in harmonic oscillators, as high stabilizer values do not necessarily imply proximity to an ideal GKP state. This finding is essential for refining error characterization protocols and ensuring accurate benchmarking in fault-tolerant quantum architectures.
Stabilizers may be poor bounds for fidelities
arXiv:2512.14811v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The defining feature of ideal Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states is that they are unchanged by stabilizers, which allow them to detect and correct for common errors without destroying the quantum information encoded in the states. Given this property, can one use the amount to which a state is unchanged by the stabilizers as a proxy for the quality of a GKP state? This is shown to hold in the opposite manner to which it is routinely assumed, because in fact the fidelity a state has to an ideal GKP state is only \textit{upper} bounded by the stabilizer expectation values. This means that, for qubits encoded in harmonic oscillators via the GKP code, a good stabilizer expectation value does not guarantee proximity to an ideal GKP state in terms of any distance based on fidelity.
Abstract:The defining feature of ideal Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states is that they are unchanged by stabilizers, which allow them to detect and correct for common errors without destroying the quantum information encoded in the states. Given this property, can one use the amount to which a state is unchanged by the stabilizers as a proxy for the quality of a GKP state? This is shown to hold in the opposite manner to which it is routinely assumed, because in fact the fidelity a state has to an ideal GKP state is only \textit{upper} bounded by the stabilizer expectation values. This means that, for qubits encoded in harmonic oscillators via the GKP code, a good stabilizer expectation value does not guarantee proximity to an ideal GKP state in terms of any distance based on fidelity.
arXiv:2512.14811 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2512.14811v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.14811 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Phys. Rev. A (2026) 114, 032413
https://doi.org/10.1103/d36t-6w76 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 238 words
Related coverage

Article: The AI Productivity Paradox in Test Automation: Moving beyond Structural Validation to Perception and Intent
InfoQ · Jun 1, 2026

Stabilizer Ranks, Barnes Wall Lattices and Magic Monotones
Quantum Journal · Jul 29, 2026
Stabilizer Ranks, Barnes Wall Lattices and Magic Monotones
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026

[AINews] DeepSeek v4.1-Flash: 763B-P8B-D16B novel causal Encoder–Decoder architecture with vision marks the Return of the Whale
Latent Space · Sep 12, 2026