Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research relaxes restrictive uniform boundedness assumptions in generalization theory by introducing a stability framework based on finite $L_p$ moments, making it applicable to modern heavy-tailed loss scenarios. By extending McDiarmid's bounded-differences techniques, the authors derive sharp high-probability guarantees for diverse paradigms like empirical risk minimization and meta-learning without requiring sub-Gaussian tails. The work significantly weakens standard theoretical constraints while maintaining robustness for learning algorithms operating under unbounded conditions.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, negocios.com
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Stability beyond Bounded Differences: Sharp Generalization Bounds under Finite $L_p$ Moments

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.06855v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While algorithmic stability is a central tool for understanding generalization of learning algorithms, existing high-probability guarantees typically rely on uniform boundedness or sub-Gaussian/sub-Weibull tail assumptions, which can be overly restrictive for modern settings with heavy-tailed or unbounded losses. We develop a stability-based framework that requires only a finite $L_p$ moment condition. Our first contribution is sharp concentration inequalities for functions of independent random variables under $L_p$ constraints, extending McDiarmid's bounded-differences techniques beyond the classical regime. Leveraging these results, we derive sharp high-probability generalization bounds across a range of learning paradigms, including empirical risk minimization, transductive regression, and meta-learning. These guarantees show that $L_p$ stability suffices for robust generalization even when boundedness fails, substantially weakening the standard assumptions in the stability literature.

Abstract:While algorithmic stability is a central tool for understanding generalization of learning algorithms, existing high-probability guarantees typically rely on uniform boundedness or sub-Gaussian/sub-Weibull tail assumptions, which can be overly restrictive for modern settings with heavy-tailed or unbounded losses. We develop a stability-based framework that requires only a finite $L_p$ moment condition. Our first contribution is sharp concentration inequalities for functions of independent random variables under $L_p$ constraints, extending McDiarmid's bounded-differences techniques beyond the classical regime. Leveraging these results, we derive sharp high-probability generalization bounds across a range of learning paradigms, including empirical risk minimization, transductive regression, and meta-learning. These guarantees show that $L_p$ stability suffices for robust generalization even when boundedness fails, substantially weakening the standard assumptions in the stability literature.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Statistics Theory (math.ST)

arXiv:2606.06855 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2606.06855v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06855 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words

Related coverage