Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

SSP-Bench introduces a dynamic framework to address critical flaws in static LLM evaluation, such as data contamination and score saturation caused by linguistic variations. By formulating benchmark construction as a multi-objective optimization problem, the system ensures label validity and reveals systematic failures like safety-over-refusal coupling that static tests miss. This shift toward on-demand, deployment-relevant testing is essential for accurately assessing model behavior in real-world scenarios involving safety, security, and privacy.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

SSP-Bench: A Hybrid Data Generation Framework for Safety, Security, and Privacy Evaluation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.25352v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for safety, security, and privacy (SSP) relies heavily on static benchmarks, which suffer from score saturation, data contamination, and aggregation artifacts, and fail to capture sensitivity to linguistic variation. As a result, models that perform well on fixed test sets often fail under semantically equivalent rephrasings. We introduce SSP-Bench, a dynamic benchmarking framework that generates evaluation instances on demand while preserving domain consistency. The framework ensures label validity through externally grounded sources, enforces scope via service-specific validation, and calibrates difficulty using a multi-model steering panel. Benchmark construction is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem over difficulty, separability, novelty, and diversity. Across 24 models and four SSP services, SSP-Bench reveals systematic failures of static evaluation, including near-zero correlation in safety rankings due to construct mixing, strong safety--over-refusal coupling, and hidden within-family regressions. These results show that static benchmarks can misrepresent model behavior, motivating dynamic, deployment-relevant evaluation.

Abstract:Evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for safety, security, and privacy (SSP) relies heavily on static benchmarks, which suffer from score saturation, data contamination, and aggregation artifacts, and fail to capture sensitivity to linguistic variation. As a result, models that perform well on fixed test sets often fail under semantically equivalent rephrasings. We introduce SSP-Bench, a dynamic benchmarking framework that generates evaluation instances on demand while preserving domain consistency. The framework ensures label validity through externally grounded sources, enforces scope via service-specific validation, and calibrates difficulty using a multi-model steering panel. Benchmark construction is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem over difficulty, separability, novelty, and diversity. Across 24 models and four SSP services, SSP-Bench reveals systematic failures of static evaluation, including near-zero correlation in safety rankings due to construct mixing, strong safety--over-refusal coupling, and hidden within-family regressions. These results show that static benchmarks can misrepresent model behavior, motivating dynamic, deployment-relevant evaluation.

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2609.25352 [cs.CR]

(or arXiv:2609.25352v1 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25352 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words

Related coverage