aiqbench analysis
This study introduces a Spatially Masked Regression (SMR) framework that quantifies the balance between local and distributed information in neural recordings by systematically withholding neighboring electrodes. The results demonstrate that while nearby channels contribute significantly to signal reconstruction, substantial predictive information persists across the broader network, particularly in scalp EEG compared to intracranial EEG. This interpretable approach provides a rigorous method for distinguishing local redundancy from global structural organization in electrophysiological data without relying solely on marginal statistics.
Spatially Masked Regression Reveals Local and Distributed Predictability in Electrophysiological Recordings
arXiv:2606.11415v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural recordings are often interpreted as local measurements, yet the signal at any one sensor can also reflect structured activity distributed across the broader network. This raises a basic question: to what extent does an electrode's signal reflect local versus distributed information in the underlying system? More specifically, how much of an electrode's activity is carried by its immediate neighborhood, and how much is embedded more broadly across the array? We address this with a Spatially Masked Regression (SMR) framework that reconstructs each electrode's timeseries from the remaining electrodes while excluding a configurable neighborhood around the target. By progressively increasing this mask, spatial locality becomes an experimental control for quantifying how much predictive information survives after nearby channels are withheld. We apply SMR to intracranial EEG with heterogeneous electrode coverage and to scalp EEG with standardized montages over sensorimotor cortex. Using distance correlation between original and reconstructed signals, we find strong within-subject reconstruction in both modalities, substantial residual predictability even when local neighbors are excluded, and markedly stronger cross-subject transfer in EEG than in iEEG. Masking shows that nearby electrodes contribute strongly to reconstruction but do not account for all of it, indicating that individual channels reflect both local redundancy and broader distributed structure. Surrogates that preserve selected marginal or spectral properties while disrupting phase structure or temporal ordering substantially reduce performance, supporting the conclusion that SMR depends on structured temporal and cross-channel organization rather than on marginal statistics alone. These results position SMR as an interpretable framework for quantifying the balance between local and distributed information in recordings.
Abstract:Neural recordings are often interpreted as local measurements, yet the signal at any one sensor can also reflect structured activity distributed across the broader network. This raises a basic question: to what extent does an electrode's signal reflect local versus distributed information in the underlying system? More specifically, how much of an electrode's activity is carried by its immediate neighborhood, and how much is embedded more broadly across the array? We address this with a Spatially Masked Regression (SMR) framework that reconstructs each electrode's timeseries from the remaining electrodes while excluding a configurable neighborhood around the target. By progressively increasing this mask, spatial locality becomes an experimental control for quantifying how much predictive information survives after nearby channels are withheld. We apply SMR to intracranial EEG with heterogeneous electrode coverage and to scalp EEG with standardized montages over sensorimotor cortex. Using distance correlation between original and reconstructed signals, we find strong within-subject reconstruction in both modalities, substantial residual predictability even when local neighbors are excluded, and markedly stronger cross-subject transfer in EEG than in iEEG. Masking shows that nearby electrodes contribute strongly to reconstruction but do not account for all of it, indicating that individual channels reflect both local redundancy and broader distributed structure. Surrogates that preserve selected marginal or spectral properties while disrupting phase structure or temporal ordering substantially reduce performance, supporting the conclusion that SMR depends on structured temporal and cross-channel organization rather than on marginal statistics alone. These results position SMR as an interpretable framework for quantifying the balance between local and distributed information in recordings.
Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
arXiv:2606.11415 [q-bio.NC]
(or arXiv:2606.11415v1 [q-bio.NC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.11415 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 290 words
Related coverage
Autoregressive Drillhole Modelling Under Distribution Shift
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026
A new way to make quantum light skips external lasers
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 1, 2026
Diffusion Transformer World-Action Model for AV Scene Prediction
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026
ORBIT-2 based Weather and Climate Downscaling and Downscaled Global Forecasts on AMD Instinct
AMD · Jun 8, 2026