aiqbench analysis
This research advances port safety by framing flood pre-warning as an incident-cluster learning problem, addressing the critical issue of temporal dependence in rare event datasets. The study demonstrates that sparse feature selection combined with cluster-based grouping significantly improves model robustness and interpretability compared to standard row-level classification approaches. By validating these methods against multiple regional datasets, the work provides a rigorous offline-evaluated module ready for integration into digital twin architectures.
Sparse Incident-Cluster Learning for 12-hour Port Flood Pre-warning in Digital-Twin Analytics
arXiv:2609.06109v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Port flood digital twins require analytics that warn operators before disruption, but official warning incidents are often few and adjacent observations are temporally dependent. Row-level classification can therefore overstate performance by placing windows from the same event in both model-development and evaluation data. We formulate 12-hour port flood pre-warning as an incident-cluster learning problem and evaluate a digital-twin analytics module using eight-point water-level histories, prediction-time contextual covariates, and interpretable short-window dynamics. The protocol combines fold-specific sparse feature selection, warning-cluster grouping, negative-label controls, 100-repeat random top-k controls, and alert-episode evaluation. Liverpool is the primary four-cluster case study, with harmonised Humber/Hull-proxy and Wessex South data used for protocol-transfer checks. Across the Liverpool folds, the top-10 ElasticNet model achieves mean F2 = 0.696, compared with 0.633 without top-k truncation and 0.681 for full-feature weighted XGBoost. It is the strongest ElasticNet variant, remains competitive with the nonlinear reference using only ten predictors, and exceeds the repeat-level 95th percentile of broad and same-family random subsets. Contextual covariates provide a strong prediction-time anchor, complemented by physically interpretable local dynamics. Historical replay converts risk scores into alert episodes and measures alert duration and false-episode burden. The result is an offline-evaluated analytics and validation module designed for integration into a port digital twin.
Abstract:Port flood digital twins require analytics that warn operators before disruption, but official warning incidents are often few and adjacent observations are temporally dependent. Row-level classification can therefore overstate performance by placing windows from the same event in both model-development and evaluation data. We formulate 12-hour port flood pre-warning as an incident-cluster learning problem and evaluate a digital-twin analytics module using eight-point water-level histories, prediction-time contextual covariates, and interpretable short-window dynamics. The protocol combines fold-specific sparse feature selection, warning-cluster grouping, negative-label controls, 100-repeat random top-k controls, and alert-episode evaluation. Liverpool is the primary four-cluster case study, with harmonised Humber/Hull-proxy and Wessex South data used for protocol-transfer checks. Across the Liverpool folds, the top-10 ElasticNet model achieves mean F2 = 0.696, compared with 0.633 without top-k truncation and 0.681 for full-feature weighted XGBoost. It is the strongest ElasticNet variant, remains competitive with the nonlinear reference using only ten predictors, and exceeds the repeat-level 95th percentile of broad and same-family random subsets. Contextual covariates provide a strong prediction-time anchor, complemented by physically interpretable local dynamics. Historical replay converts risk scores into alert episodes and measures alert duration and false-episode burden. The result is an offline-evaluated analytics and validation module designed for integration into a port digital twin.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.06109 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.06109v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.06109 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 299 words
Related coverage

Frontier Risk Report (February to March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026