Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research presents SOVER, a framework that leverages Large Language Models to generate optimization reformulations while using formal SMT solvers (Z3 and dReal) to rigorously certify their semantic equivalence. By decoupling LLM-based mapping from formal verification, the system achieves 99.33% accuracy on a new nonlinear benchmark, addressing critical reliability issues like numerical artifacts and local minima that plague empirical solver testing alone. The release of the NLEquiv-150 dataset provides a valuable resource for advancing trustworthy automated optimization workflows.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

SOVER: Formal Certification of Optimization Reformulations via LLM-Assisted SMT Verification

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.00728v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable promise in translating and reformulating complex mathematical optimization problems across modeling languages. However, validating such transformations through empirical solver executions alone is unreliable, as solver outcomes may be affected by local minima, structural timeouts, numerical artifacts, and subtle semantic divergence between formulations. We introduce SOVER, an LLM-assisted SMT framework that separates semantic mapping from formal certification: Z3 checks domain cross-feasibility and global objective-order preservation for mixed-integer linear formulations, while dReal provides tolerance-aware feasibility/range and $\epsilon$-argmin checks for continuous nonlinear formulations. We also introduce NLEquiv-150, a public benchmark of 100 equivalent and 50 deliberately hard non-equivalent nonlinear reformulation pairs. With LLM-extracted mappings, SOVER classifies 149/150 pairs (99.33%) correctly, including all 50 hard negatives; the sole error is an incomplete mapping extraction.

Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable promise in translating and reformulating complex mathematical optimization problems across modeling languages. However, validating such transformations through empirical solver executions alone is unreliable, as solver outcomes may be affected by local minima, structural timeouts, numerical artifacts, and subtle semantic divergence between formulations. We introduce SOVER, an LLM-assisted SMT framework that separates semantic mapping from formal certification: Z3 checks domain cross-feasibility and global objective-order preservation for mixed-integer linear formulations, while dReal provides tolerance-aware feasibility/range and $\epsilon$-argmin checks for continuous nonlinear formulations. We also introduce NLEquiv-150, a public benchmark of 100 equivalent and 50 deliberately hard non-equivalent nonlinear reformulation pairs. With LLM-extracted mappings, SOVER classifies 149/150 pairs (99.33%) correctly, including all 50 hard negatives; the sole error is an incomplete mapping extraction.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2609.00728 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.00728v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00728 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 228 words

Related coverage