Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This study leverages massive proprietary datasets to reveal that sophisticated generative AI usage is deeply tied to seniority and specific functional domains like strategy, rather than being easily improved through time or standard training. The findings suggest that domain expertise acts as a critical complement to LLM capabilities, while formal interventions may fail to alter user sophistication without structural changes. For practitioners, this highlights the persistent gap between basic prompting and advanced, context-aware AI integration in enterprise environments.
Sources coveringarXiv, Analytics Vidhya
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Sophistication in GenAI Use: Field Evidence from a Large Firm

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.27364v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study how sophistication in generative AI (genAI) use varies among the back-office workforce of a large firm. Using proprietary data, we observe 713,564 employee prompts and their corresponding large language model responses from nearly 4,000 back-office employees across 15 functional areas over eight months in 2025. We document three main findings. First, senior employees exhibit more sophisticated genAI use, consistent with domain expertise complementing genAI capabilities. Second, sophistication varies considerably across functions and is highest in Strategy, Digital Innovation, and Project Management, three groups that share a focus on firmwide strategic initiatives and organizational change. Third, we observe neither improvements in sophistication over time nor lasting improvements following formal AI training, suggesting that sophisticated use can be difficult to change. Together, our study provides measures of and insights into sophisticated genAI use that managers can use to improve outcomes and that researchers can use in future research.

Abstract:We study how sophistication in generative AI (genAI) use varies among the back-office workforce of a large firm. Using proprietary data, we observe 713,564 employee prompts and their corresponding large language model responses from nearly 4,000 back-office employees across 15 functional areas over eight months in 2025. We document three main findings. First, senior employees exhibit more sophisticated genAI use, consistent with domain expertise complementing genAI capabilities. Second, sophistication varies considerably across functions and is highest in Strategy, Digital Innovation, and Project Management, three groups that share a focus on firmwide strategic initiatives and organizational change. Third, we observe neither improvements in sophistication over time nor lasting improvements following formal AI training, suggesting that sophisticated use can be difficult to change. Together, our study provides measures of and insights into sophisticated genAI use that managers can use to improve outcomes and that researchers can use in future research.

59 pages, 4 figures, 8 tables. Includes Appendix A (variable definitions), Appendix B (supplementary tables), and Online Appendix C (meta prompts)

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); General Economics (econ.GN)

arXiv:2608.27364 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.27364v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27364 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 266 words

Related coverage