Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This systematic review exposes critical vulnerabilities in autonomous LLM trading agents, revealing that nearly all academic schemes fail basic robustness checks and are susceptible to cascading market crashes. The study highlights a dangerous gap between domain-agnostic AI security research and the high-stakes realities of financial markets where single agent failures can trigger systemic collapse. For readers focused on agentic AI safety, this work underscores the urgent need for specialized evaluation frameworks that account for adversarial reflexive environments before deploying such systems in production.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

SoK: Trading Agents or Market Crashers? Dissecting Robustness and Security Failures in Academic Financial LLM Trading Schemes

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.19705v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous large language model (LLM) agents are moving rapidly into high-stakes domains, yet existing agentic-AI security studies remain largely domain-agnostic and overlook the distinctive, high-consequence attack surface such settings create. We examine this gap through financial trading agents, a representative case of high-stakes agentic security, where a single compromised agent has direct execution authority over real capital in an adversarial, reflexive market. To this end, we present FARSIGHT (Financial Agent Robustness and Security Investigation and Global Holistic Testing), a framework that performs scheme-level evaluation of financial LLM agents on two axes: robustness under market turbulence (including flash-crash-like scenarios), and security against three attack types: attacks on information sources, attacks on agents, and agent-as-attacker behaviors. Applying FARSIGHT to 15 representative academic schemes, we find that most overlook robustness and realistic adversarial threats: 80% fail at least one core robustness metric and 100% exhibit security vulnerabilities. These two failure modes are inseparable: a small misjudgment can cascade into a market-wide crash on its own, while an adversary can deliberately trigger the same collapse at minimal cost.

Title:SoK: Trading Agents or Market Crashers? Dissecting Robustness and Security Failures in Academic Financial LLM Trading Schemes

Abstract:Autonomous large language model (LLM) agents are moving rapidly into high-stakes domains, yet existing agentic-AI security studies remain largely domain-agnostic and overlook the distinctive, high-consequence attack surface such settings create. We examine this gap through financial trading agents, a representative case of high-stakes agentic security, where a single compromised agent has direct execution authority over real capital in an adversarial, reflexive market. To this end, we present FARSIGHT (Financial Agent Robustness and Security Investigation and Global Holistic Testing), a framework that performs scheme-level evaluation of financial LLM agents on two axes: robustness under market turbulence (including flash-crash-like scenarios), and security against three attack types: attacks on information sources, attacks on agents, and agent-as-attacker behaviors. Applying FARSIGHT to 15 representative academic schemes, we find that most overlook robustness and realistic adversarial threats: 80% fail at least one core robustness metric and 100% exhibit security vulnerabilities. These two failure modes are inseparable: a small misjudgment can cascade into a market-wide crash on its own, while an adversary can deliberately trigger the same collapse at minimal cost.

24 pages, 6 figures, 11 tables, 118 references. SoK paper. Evaluates 15 academic financial LLM trading agent schemes on robustness and security

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

K.6.5; I.2.11; I.2.7; K.4.4; J.1

arXiv:2609.19705 [cs.CR]

(or arXiv:2609.19705v1 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19705 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 319 words

Related coverage