aiqbench analysis
This research introduces SoFT, a supervised fine-tuning technique designed to balance acquiring new capabilities from multi-domain teachers while preserving the base model's generalization abilities. By minimizing KL divergence and utilizing domain-specific gradient budgets, the method effectively addresses the trade-off between in-distribution learning and out-of-distribution performance in agentic tasks.
SoFT: Soft Targets for Generalizable LLM Fine-Tuning
arXiv:2609.32493v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Distillation enables student language models to acquire new capabilities from expert teachers. However, integrating knowledge from multi-teacher, multi-domain demonstrations into a single student remains challenging. We study supervised fine-tuning (SFT) in this setting, where students must acquire diverse capabilities while maintaining generalization beyond the training tasks. Our experiments reveal varying trade-offs between in-distribution learning and out-of-distribution generalization across SFT methods, motivating more explicit control over this balance. To this end, we propose soft-target fine-tuning (SoFT) to balance learning from teacher demonstrations with retaining the Base model's existing capabilities. SoFT sets a minimum target probability for each demonstrated token while making the smallest KL change to the Base distribution. The resulting objective couples learning from demonstrations with adaptively weighted regularization toward the Base model. We further use domain-specific gradient budgets to control this balance and determine a probability threshold for each trajectory. Experiments on mixed-domain reasoning and agentic tasks show that SoFT achieves the best overall performance among the compared methods, with improvements in both in-distribution capability acquisition and out-of-distribution generalization.
Abstract:Distillation enables student language models to acquire new capabilities from expert teachers. However, integrating knowledge from multi-teacher, multi-domain demonstrations into a single student remains challenging. We study supervised fine-tuning (SFT) in this setting, where students must acquire diverse capabilities while maintaining generalization beyond the training tasks. Our experiments reveal varying trade-offs between in-distribution learning and out-of-distribution generalization across SFT methods, motivating more explicit control over this balance. To this end, we propose soft-target fine-tuning (SoFT) to balance learning from teacher demonstrations with retaining the Base model's existing capabilities. SoFT sets a minimum target probability for each demonstrated token while making the smallest KL change to the Base distribution. The resulting objective couples learning from demonstrations with adaptively weighted regularization toward the Base model. We further use domain-specific gradient budgets to control this balance and determine a probability threshold for each trajectory. Experiments on mixed-domain reasoning and agentic tasks show that SoFT achieves the best overall performance among the compared methods, with improvements in both in-distribution capability acquisition and out-of-distribution generalization.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.32493 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.32493v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32493 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 267 words
Related coverage

How uniopen customized Amazon Nova to their retail moderation policies for production deployment
AWS · Oct 1, 2026

Evaluating task vectors, unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026
Probabilistic Calibration Is a Trainable Capability in Language Models
arXiv · Oct 12, 2026