Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper challenges the prevailing view that Spacetime State Realism in Everettian Quantum Mechanics is dynamically local, arguing instead that its inherent non-separability complicates compatibility with relativistic causality. The analysis focuses on the ontological implications of reduced density matrices for non-localized regions, offering a rigorous theoretical critique relevant to foundational quantum mechanics research.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Snakes on a Hyper-Plane: Dynamical and Ontological Locality in Everettian Quantum Mechanics

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.07860v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An apparently emerging consensus holds that Everettian Quantum Mechanics (EQM), in the Spacetime State Realism (SSR) version of Wallace and Timpson, involves ontological non-locality (i.e., non-separability) but is fully compatible with the dynamical notion of locality usually taken to be required by relativity. The claim of dynamical locality is based on the fact that the local beables postulated by the theory (namely, Reduced Density Matrices, RDMs, associated with localized regions) are not affected by interventions outside their past light cones. However, the theory's non-separability means that it posits non-local beables (namely RDMs for non-localized regions) in addition to the local ones. We argue here that the involvement of non-local beables introduces complications for extant formulations of dynamical locality and at least suggests, contrary to the emerging consensus, that SSR EQM should perhaps not be considered compatible with relativistic causality after all.

Abstract:An apparently emerging consensus holds that Everettian Quantum Mechanics (EQM), in the Spacetime State Realism (SSR) version of Wallace and Timpson, involves ontological non-locality (i.e., non-separability) but is fully compatible with the dynamical notion of locality usually taken to be required by relativity. The claim of dynamical locality is based on the fact that the local beables postulated by the theory (namely, Reduced Density Matrices, RDMs, associated with localized regions) are not affected by interventions outside their past light cones. However, the theory's non-separability means that it posits non-local beables (namely RDMs for non-localized regions) in addition to the local ones. We argue here that the involvement of non-local beables introduces complications for extant formulations of dynamical locality and at least suggests, contrary to the emerging consensus, that SSR EQM should perhaps not be considered compatible with relativistic causality after all.

arXiv:2609.07860 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.07860v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07860 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 232 words

Related coverage