aiqbench analysis
SMAT addresses a critical bottleneck in model merging by optimizing expert training specifically for common post-hoc operations like scaling, masking, and perturbation. This approach yields significant performance gains across language and vision-language backbones while maintaining minimal computational overhead compared to standard fine-tuning. The method represents a practical advancement for deploying efficient ensembles of large AI models without requiring joint retraining.
SMAT: Simple and Efficient Merge-Aware Training
arXiv:2609.33437v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model merging integrates the capabilities of multiple experts without joint retraining, but standard expert training optimizes task loss alone and does not guarantee good performance after merging. Merge-aware training (MAT) aims to improve merged performance, but existing methods do not fully account for common merging operations and add training cost. We observe that, from an expert's perspective, common merging methods can be described by three operations: Scale reweights its own update, Mask removes selected coordinates, and Perturb adds updates from other experts. Based on this view, we introduce SMAT (Simple MAT), which jointly optimizes expert loss and expected loss at simulated merged parameters generated by sampling scaling coefficients, masks, and additive noise. We further introduce periodic scheduling, kernel fusion, and parameter storage switching to make SMAT efficient, with one forward and one backward pass per step. Across four language and vision-language backbones, SMAT improves the mean score across five merging methods by 1.07-2.16 points over the strongest baseline for each backbone, with less than 2% training-time overhead over standard fine-tuning.
Abstract:Model merging integrates the capabilities of multiple experts without joint retraining, but standard expert training optimizes task loss alone and does not guarantee good performance after merging. Merge-aware training (MAT) aims to improve merged performance, but existing methods do not fully account for common merging operations and add training cost. We observe that, from an expert's perspective, common merging methods can be described by three operations: Scale reweights its own update, Mask removes selected coordinates, and Perturb adds updates from other experts. Based on this view, we introduce SMAT (Simple MAT), which jointly optimizes expert loss and expected loss at simulated merged parameters generated by sampling scaling coefficients, masks, and additive noise. We further introduce periodic scheduling, kernel fusion, and parameter storage switching to make SMAT efficient, with one forward and one backward pass per step. Across four language and vision-language backbones, SMAT improves the mean score across five merging methods by 1.07-2.16 points over the strongest baseline for each backbone, with less than 2% training-time overhead over standard fine-tuning.
19 pages, 6 figures, 7 tables. Code: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.33437 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.33437v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33437 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026

Adaptive Parallel Reasoning: The Next Paradigm in Efficient Inference Scaling
BAIR Blog · May 8, 2026
[AINews] AI Engineer NYC: Gemini 4 Argon, Vals AI Benchmarks
Latent Space · Oct 14, 2026

Can we change an AI model’s architecture without retraining it from scratch?
Amazon Science · Oct 12, 2026