aiqbench analysis
SlopBench introduces a new benchmark evaluating language models on their tendency to generate repetitive, "stiff" prose across various domains like email and social media. By analyzing surface-level behaviors such as paragraph rhythm and lexical diversity, the study challenges current AI detectors that often fail to distinguish between high-quality machine writing and low-effort output. This research provides a critical metric for assessing model quality beyond standard accuracy or safety benchmarks, focusing on the human readability of generated content.
SlopBench: How Well Can We Rank Language Models by Slop? A Multi-Domain Benchmark of Repetitive AI Writing
arXiv:2609.33905v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: SlopBench asks which models produce the stiff, repetitive prose readers call AI slop, a question detectors leave open once they have classified a text as machine-written. We evaluated eighteen models on 112 hand-written tasks in email, social posts, essays, and workplace chat, sampling each model on each task up to ten times, for 19,928 outputs in all. SlopBench scores four surface behaviors a reader can check by hand: length against the word band each task specifies, opener repetition across a model's own samples of one task, and paragraph rhythm and fixed lexical constructions against pre-ChatGPT human corpora. Under one fixed weighting, Kimi K2.6 scores lowest at 21.1 and Mistral Large highest at 40.6. Across 500 random reweightings Kimi has the lowest score in 58 percent of draws and Mistral the highest in 97 percent. No draw preserves the full order of the eighteen, and a scenario bootstrap leaves exactly one of those ranks unambiguous. We ran three further checks on that middle order: a crowd arena, an AI detector, and lexical diversity. None of them confirmed the order. We therefore report the four behaviors separately and treat the composite as one weighting among many, and we release the prompts, outputs, reference statistics, and scoring code.
Title:SlopBench: How Well Can We Rank Language Models by Slop? A Multi-Domain Benchmark of Repetitive AI Writing
Abstract:SlopBench asks which models produce the stiff, repetitive prose readers call AI slop, a question detectors leave open once they have classified a text as machine-written. We evaluated eighteen models on 112 hand-written tasks in email, social posts, essays, and workplace chat, sampling each model on each task up to ten times, for 19,928 outputs in all. SlopBench scores four surface behaviors a reader can check by hand: length against the word band each task specifies, opener repetition across a model's own samples of one task, and paragraph rhythm and fixed lexical constructions against pre-ChatGPT human corpora. Under one fixed weighting, Kimi K2.6 scores lowest at 21.1 and Mistral Large highest at 40.6. Across 500 random reweightings Kimi has the lowest score in 58 percent of draws and Mistral the highest in 97 percent. No draw preserves the full order of the eighteen, and a scenario bootstrap leaves exactly one of those ranks unambiguous. We ran three further checks on that middle order: a crowd arena, an AI detector, and lexical diversity. None of them confirmed the order. We therefore report the four behaviors separately and treat the composite as one weighting among many, and we release the prompts, outputs, reference statistics, and scoring code.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.33905 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.33905v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33905 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 317 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · Oct 2, 2026
Amazon is investing in the Lean Focused Research Organization
Amazon Science · Jul 26, 2026