aiqbench analysis
SleuthBench introduces a novel evaluation framework for LLM agents by injecting controlled statistical anomalies into tabular datasets, ensuring verifiable ground truth independent of model memorization. The study reveals that while current models can reliably detect data-quality issues, they struggle significantly with recovering feature contributions unless provided with precomputed statistical artifacts like the proposed "Empirical Layer." This work advances the field of machine learning by establishing rigorous benchmarks for assessing an agent's true analytical reasoning capabilities rather than its ability to recall public dataset facts.
SleuthBench: Benchmarking Statistical LLM Evaluation Using Tabular Hidden Signals
arXiv:2609.34228v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating statistical discovery by large language model (LLM) agents requires verifiable analytical ground truth. Establishing such ground truth for real-world datasets is costly, and prior knowledge of public datasets can influence agent responses. We introduce SLEUTHBENCH, a benchmark that addresses both problems by injecting controlled data-quality problems and feature effects into public tabular datasets: the injected pattern determines the answer, so reference answers are computed automatically and memorized knowledge of the original table is insufficient, while the table keeps its background structure. The injected patterns are modeled on phenomena reported in real data analyses. The benchmark defines 17 question templates in two families: data-quality questions and feature-contribution questions. We evaluate six state-of-the-art LLMs that analyze the data using a Python coding tool, on data-science and business phrasings of 70 validated dataset-template combinations, yielding 1680 graded responses in total. The models detect data-quality problems reliably (83.8% accuracy) but recover feature contributions poorly (41.9%). Finding how features shape the target requires searching over both candidate variables and analytical procedures. To address this issue, we propose the Empirical Layer, a set of precomputed statistical artifacts comprising summaries, fitted feature and interaction effects, and dataset descriptions, which exposes candidate patterns for direct inspection. Access to these artifacts raises feature-contribution accuracy from 41.9% to 68.0%.
Abstract:Evaluating statistical discovery by large language model (LLM) agents requires verifiable analytical ground truth. Establishing such ground truth for real-world datasets is costly, and prior knowledge of public datasets can influence agent responses. We introduce SLEUTHBENCH, a benchmark that addresses both problems by injecting controlled data-quality problems and feature effects into public tabular datasets: the injected pattern determines the answer, so reference answers are computed automatically and memorized knowledge of the original table is insufficient, while the table keeps its background structure. The injected patterns are modeled on phenomena reported in real data analyses. The benchmark defines 17 question templates in two families: data-quality questions and feature-contribution questions. We evaluate six state-of-the-art LLMs that analyze the data using a Python coding tool, on data-science and business phrasings of 70 validated dataset-template combinations, yielding 1680 graded responses in total. The models detect data-quality problems reliably (83.8% accuracy) but recover feature contributions poorly (41.9%). Finding how features shape the target requires searching over both candidate variables and analytical procedures. To address this issue, we propose the Empirical Layer, a set of precomputed statistical artifacts comprising summaries, fitted feature and interaction effects, and dataset descriptions, which exposes candidate patterns for direct inspection. Access to these artifacts raises feature-contribution accuracy from 41.9% to 68.0%.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.34228 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.34228v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34228 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 304 words
Related coverage
CoMedBench: A Multi-Source Benchmark of Synthetic Medical Data Fidelity and Downstream Utility
arXiv · Aug 20, 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 23, 2026

What We Learned Trying to Catch AI Liars: An Aletheia's Quest Retrospective
EleutherAI · Aug 25, 2026